.50 Beowulf 3rd Party Magazines

AlbertaGunslinger said:
@Darkwater, you are in fact the one who is wrong. Canadians do have a legal RIGHT to bear arms, this right comes from British Common Law which has been protected and enshrined in Canada twice, first with the BNA Act when out country was created and again in 1982 with the Constitution Act. The two main sources from which our right to bear arms is derived are; the "Commentaries on the Laws of England" (1765) by Sir William Blackstone and the English Bill of Rights (1689). Both of these sources prove that Canadians have a legal and undeniable right to bear arms, the court decisions that exist that say otherwise are simply wrong decisions made by liberal activist judges.

Beyond the legal basis there exists the widely accepted concept of "natural rights", this means that the fundamental rights that we have as human beings are all the same, it means that our rights are inherent in nature and that they are not created by any government or any man. While government recognition is a benefit, it is in no way required for our rights to be valid.

Finally, advocating for freedom and demanding that your right to keep and bear arms be respected are not extremist view points, an extremist view point is that you can't have an AK cause it looks scary, or you can't defend your family from violent criminals because it offends liberal sensibilities, or that a good law abiding citizen should go to jail for owning a firearm passed down through generations because he hasn't received a permission slip from the government nanny.

Now, since that is settled, 50 BEOWULF MAGS, I want them so much, NR Magazine let us know when you have an update!!!
Click to expand...

If the old British common law say we have the right to bear arms, how come the new charter has not been challenged?
The fact is that under our CURRENT supreme law this land, we do not have the right to bear arms.
 
andrew3081 said:
If the old British common law say we have the right to bear arms, how come the new charter has not been challenged?
The fact is that under our CURRENT supreme law this land, we do not have the right to bear arms.
Click to expand...
More accurately, our right has not been affirmed.
 
@Andrew3081 The Constitution Act of 1982 which is the current supreme law of the land reaffirms that British Common Law continues to apply in Canada (except for Quebec where French Civil law applies), as such the right to bear arms from Common Law continues to apply to us and as I have said, the only reason why we lost the Supreme Court case was because the Chretien government had stacked the Supreme Court with Liberal activists pretending to be judges. I am quite well versed in this whole issue and I am also formally educated on matters of Political Science.

I did not mean to turn the Beowulf mag thread into a debate so lets leave it at that and hopefully a few more people have been educated on the fact that they have a RIGHT to own firearms in Canada.
 
AlbertaGunslinger said:
@Andrew3081 The Constitution Act of 1982 which is the current supreme law of the land reaffirms that British Common Law continues to apply in Canada (except for Quebec where French Civil law applies), as such the right to bear arms from Common Law continues to apply to us and as I have said, the only reason why we lost the Supreme Court case was because the Chretien government had stacked the Supreme Court with Liberal activists pretending to be judges. I am quite well versed in this whole issue and I am also formally educated on matters of Political Science.

I did not mean to turn the Beowulf mag thread into a debate so lets leave it at that and hopefully a few more people have been educated on the fact that they have a RIGHT to own firearms in Canada.
Click to expand...

And again, this is what happens when people (with poli-sci degrees) play amateur lawyer.
As citizens we have a "right" to apply for a license under existing statute law and the regs thereto. If we are granted the license, then we have a "right" to acquire/possess firearms. These so-called "rights" are conditional, they are granted by the govn't and they can be revoked. So ya, sure, you have the "right" to own firearms...but it is a highly qualified "right". However, there is no "right" to own/bear arms in Canada as there is in the USA, ie/ in the "constitutional" sense of the word.
 
Last edited:
25mm said:
I have talked to the crime lab my self RCMP, these mags are 100% legal for use and they have no concern over them what so ever...

they will not release any form of paper work on them because it is a waiste of their time, not my words.

it is a Mag like any other and yes it works the 50 beuwolf quite nice...
Click to expand...

Well that sounds like great news!
 
As nice as verbal correspondence is, we still need paperwork from the RCMP to get our import certificate. We're working a different angle at the moment.
 
25mm said:
I have talked to the crime lab my self RCMP, these mags are 100% legal for use and they have no concern over them what so ever...

they will not release any form of paper work on them because it is a waiste of their time, not my words.

it is a Mag like any other and yes it works the 50 beuwolf quite nice...
Click to expand...

I'm not going to say that that statement is flimsy, but if it were my firearm liberties at stake, I'd want a little bit more convincing than a post on CGN.

25mm, do you have the name of the person/people you spoke with in the RCMP so we can check with them ourselves?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom