I love the 9.3x62 and I’m on number 3, but I still can’t see what it will a accomplish that a 200gr partition in a 3006 won’t.
But where’s the fun in that!
It’s the nearly the same analogy as the .308/30-06 debate . Yes with light for caliber ammo they are close . When you put heavy pills in them the difference is magnified substantially. A 9.3x62 loaded warm and heavy is an entirely different beast.
I love the 9.3x62 and I’m on number 3, but I still can’t see what it will a accomplish that a 200gr partition in a 3006 won’t.
But where’s the fun in that!
Bigger holes better. - dan
I love the 9.3x62 and I’m on number 3, but I still can’t see what it will a accomplish that a 200gr partition in a 3006 won’t.
But where’s the fun in that!
Just fired my 9.3x62 for the first time and the recoil wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be, I was pleasantly surprised. It does have a pretty wicked muzzle break on the front of it that did the job so well that the front sight fell off lol. I guess I don't need back up irons! Now all I have to do is find a better scope than the one that came with the rifle.
Does anyone else have on-game performance experience with the PRVI?
My 8x57 with 200 grain bullets going 2450fps give me more felt recoils than my HVA 9.3x62 with 270gn bullets going 2500fps… I think stock design and overall rifle weight makes a huge difference on felt recoil!
recoil pad is helping on reducing the felt of the recoil.