It's not that anyone thinks you're lying, just that you're attempting to present a glaringly obviously NOT scientifically relevant/serious test as though it was. Your test was rushed, and it almost seemed like you wanted the gun to fail, based on how excited people got when it did. There was nothing professional about the video, but you're expecting to be taken seriously and praised.
If you want to be taken seriously, you have to be a bit more serious.
But at the end of the day, like I said before, good things came of the video regardless. We know that the Siberian has serious over-insertion problems. We learned that it prefers some mags over others, probably because they're less prone to over-insertion; and now Siberian owners or potential Siberian owners know what mags to buy, or at least what mags not to buy. So thanks either way.
Ah. i think i see the confusion going on here. MrMeatshowers video was not "the test" in totality. nor is the video the final and formal report. His video and the shooting/testing it encompasses is just one section of the testing, the Full report with a detailed breakdown of each type of stoppage will be typed up and formatted into a PDF. This video was more of a light hearted sneak peak done in his format. as i said, we do have to work on out communication a little bit and make it clear what is and is not the official "final draft" of the report/review of the gun.
There have been other people such as the Hunting Gear Guy who have made videos both on this rifle, and the WK181 rifle that we tested previously, but if you would like a more accurate look at what you can expect from a formal CFET report, here is a link to our previous and first test's final report: the WK181!