No need to get testy. For starters, the thread is titled British or Commonwealth troops envious of the U.S. M1 Rifle, (also known as a Garand.) The M1 Garand is not a mauser. It is an autoloading rifle. But to address your point, which i assumed to be a comparison between a Mauser and an Enfield, the difference in firepower wouldn't be that pronounced. You are correct that the the capacity of the Lee Enfield is 10 rounds. However, in a combat situation, I wonder if a Brit or Canadian would take the time to load two charger clips to get to his ten round capacity after he had fired his initial ten shots. My thinking is that after the first ten, he would continue loading and firing five round chargers, rather than firing ten rounds, charging twice and firing ten rounds again.
Duker, you were in combat in Korea, was it 10-10-10-etc or was it 10-5-5 etc? I wasn't there, so I wouldn't know, just a guess.
Sunray, yes you are correct, the Australians used SMLE's. My mistake, I guess I was being lazy when I typed same, what I meant was same as in Lee Enfield. In terms of loading and firing, I don't find much difference between the two, other than the sights.