Foxer said:Ergo, it is demonstrably different than virtually every other pistol out there.
Foxer said:Well, the 'two hands' thing was my bit, not any legal definition. But i think it will be a valid argument - while a pistol may require two hands to load, it only requires one hand to operate till it's mag is empty. This firearm requires two hands to operate properly. Ergo, it is demonstrably different than virtually every other pistol out there.
HeadDamage said:How about the Remington XP-100?
Scarecrow said:I dont think the Jewish community would appreciate your use of the kapo as a reference to this.
How about the Remington XP-100?
fat tony said:Dare I bring this up but do you think the Conservatives are going to come up with an order in council making this a prohib/restricted? That would be pretty dirty if they did.
And as in the case of smooth bore shotguns...without rifling how can it still be classified as a rifle?
Dare I bring this up but do you think the Conservatives are going to come up with an order in council making this a prohib/restricted? That would be pretty dirty if they did.
effinggoof said:I want to take this opportunity to say how cool it is that so many CGN folk have found a loophole in the law, found a manufacturer and essentially produced THE ULTIMATE bear defence firearm.
Good luck with this one.



























