The ballistic instability of the round attempting stabilization is not enough to cause a 90 degree yaw in any bullet at close range regardless of twist rate. In my former employment, we examined yaw and penetration in various mediums at various distances with various twist rates and not once did we see rounds striking surfaces at 90 degrees. Yaw only occurred
AFTER the bullet passed through a medium that altered velocity which would also alter trajectory.
Kevin is much more an expert than I am due to his industry experience and prior service. however, we are both shooters, professionals, researchers and know our guns.
Steve's gun was a full size Classic Green with a 1 in 9 twist rate
(Steve: a you sure you have a 1:7 twist?). NZA's was 14.5 with a 1 in 7. The 90 edge yaw occurred before striking the paper.
It was the ammo! Not the guns, not the thick air, not a random fly in the air, not space aliens, not illegal aliens.... Well maybe illegal aliens. If you followed the logic of some of the folks who have posted on this thread then rather than knowing height over-bore or the effects of wind at distance, you'd have to know yaw rates based on distance to target and shooting position. As Kevin stated, the ballistic instability isn't heavily exaggerated when viewed in high speed and is also not predictable.
I've been taught and taught on tons of courses and not once have I seen an lecture on yaw rates from some very checked out people.
The commonality in this equation was ammunition.
I meant to obtain empty boxes from both of you to determine if there is a lot number that is common to both.
It's Norc ammo! It is far from match grade, your guns are fine.