Famae SG 540-1 - An Ongoing Review

driller212

BANNED
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
BANNED
Rating - 100%
152   0   0
Location
Edmonchuk
Hey there black rifle enthusiasts!

I have picked up yet another rifle at the expense of the previous one. Yes I go through a lot of rifles, but I am just looking for "the one". I came upon an SG 540 and did some research. There is not much out there about this rifle, some on the SG 542, but nothing on its 5.56 little brother. So I picked one up. Ain't nobody can afford a Swiss Arms :p (if you can nab one), especially with the pricing of the new imports to come in. So I am going with its Chilean Cousin and seeing how things play out. My initial impressions are very good. The bolt carrier and bolt appear to be very well made and high quality (stay tuned for pics). The rifle overall I would say appears to be a 8/10 quality wise. Let me get into the details.

The finish on the receiver actually has a very nice appearance (see pics below). We will see how durable it is over time, but I think it will do ok, the weathered look on this rifle would really suit it anyhow IMO.

The safety lever is small which is both good and bad. Good because it is out of the way of your hand when handling the rifle, and bad because it gives you little leverage and has a fair amount of resistance to actuation (not a gritty resistance if some are wondering that, it just requires more force than I imagined). This may or may not wear in with time (UPDATE it is already getting much more smooth and easy to operate).


Another point of quality to talk about is the gas block. It appears to have been cast, not as nicely finished as the Swiss Arms, but I have little doubt it is as tough.


The flash hider is pinned on. I have read about it coming loose on some rifles. If it does on this one I will find a way to shim it, or get the barrel threaded for aftermarket flash hiders.


You will notice that the receiver looks slightly different than a Swiss Arms, and I am told they are different generations ( and also different stamping patterns), with Swiss Arms PE90 being the most recent update of the design that we can have here in Canada. Here is a quote from world guns: "The SG-540 itself had not been adopted by Swiss military, but it became the platform for further improvements,which lead to the SIG-550 / Stgw.90assault rifle. SG-540 currently is in production only by FAMAE company of Chile.".


Just some pics for fun.






There is no play in the stock, and moderate play in the foregrip (typical of these types of rifles). Play between the upper and lower is less than an XCR-L/M, in fact there seems to be very little. Disassembly is easy, if you are curious watch this video:


[youtube]7IDRyksT6p4&index=30&list=PLT3_Gb4uTMRMfN-2mxnt2zA0ZRVilvpFi[/Youtube]

Here are some pics of the bolt and inside the receiver for anyone interested (I have not cleaned the rifle yet).
















AUG 19 2015 UPDATE:

Went to the 40yrd range at Phoenix. It is far less than ideal for bench shooting as the booths are incredibly uncomfortable, not to mention I forgot to bring something to use as a rear rest to stabilize the rifle. Also, just as another stab at the rifle range there, you cannot get through the mother F@#@$%^ doors to get into the range the way they are arranged! It drives me crazy!

Anyways back on topic here. Here are the groups I got in order of how they are on the target (not in order of when they were shot). The groups got smaller as I shot more, I haven't been to the range in some time so my skills slowly came back to me over the time I was there. Keep in mind these groups were shot with a 4x optic, and Chinese white box surplus. I bet I could cut these groups in half at 100yrds with a proper 20x scope on this baby. This rifle is truly going to be a paper/coyote killer.

Groups are as follows: 0.57, 3.2, 0.85, 1.037, 1.58, 0.788, 1.156, 1.904, 0.547 and one I cannot measure because I accidentally shot the guys target next to me :p but the photo is the last one posted, a good group.











The smallest groups were the last ones I shot as I had finally gained back my shooting legs so to speak. This gun is stupid accurate for a battle rifle IMO.

The rifle had a stovepipe on the first round I fired, and after that I had 100% reliability out of the remaining 49 rounds I fired. Obviously I have a long way to go to determine reliability, but so far things are looking excellent.

Some range pics:



Notice that upon ejection that the cases can be (not always) dented at the case mouth with a small dent in the case body.
 
Last edited:
I really want to do a side by side comparison with one of these FAMAE's and one of my Swiss Arms.

I would be interested in this as well, as I have only handled the Swiss Arms in stores, and really you don't have the time to take away a good impression. I think it is safe to say that the Swiss Arms are likely better made (by how much I don't know) and have a better finish on them. Anyone local to Edmonton or Calgary that has a Swiss Arms rifle, I would be interested to put these side by side.
 
Last edited:
I have a SA. I played with a Famae at a store in Stettler and was disappointed. The one I looked at was an absolute piece of junk. Horrible trigger, rear sight was on cocked eyed, mag well was way too tight and chewed the mag up when I tried to put it in and take it out. Hopefully yours is better! If you swing through my area, give me a shout and you can check out my Swiss. If I head to Edmonton anytime soon, I'll shoot you a pm and bring it along.
 
I have a SA. I played with a Famae at a store in Stettler and was disappointed. The one I looked at was an absolute piece of junk. Horrible trigger, rear sight was on cocked eyed, mag well was way too tight and chewed the mag up when I tried to put it in and take it out. Hopefully yours is better! If you swing through my area, give me a shout and you can check out my Swiss. If I head to Edmonton anytime soon, I'll shoot you a pm and bring it along.

Yea will do, it would be neat to not only note the quality differences, but the design differences between the 540 and 550 series.


What scope did you have on there. I am looking for something similar in the 1000-1300 range for my .308 FAMAE
It is a Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24, they can be had for much under $1000 used. You could get an Elcan OS4X or OS3X, or an Acog for that kind of money as well.

Looks to be a 1-4 Viper PST.

Yup.
 
Last edited:
Driller, before you fire it in, hit a fabric store and get some of that velcro tape with the sticky tape backing.
Place it on the receiver behind the ejection port just like the SA rifles.
The finish may look good but it wil still scratch up.
 
Driller, before you fire it in, hit a fabric store and get some of that velcro tape with the sticky tape backing.
Place it on the receiver behind the ejection port just like the SA rifles.
The finish may look good but it wil still scratch up.

Some people actually like that mark.

Experienced it what it'd say to me!

I will be following this thread for sure.
 
Driller, before you fire it in, hit a fabric store and get some of that velcro tape with the sticky tape backing.
Place it on the receiver behind the ejection port just like the SA rifles.
The finish may look good but it wil still scratch up.

I actually have some kicking around somewhere, might do that. I might not put any tape on because the rifle looks nice the way it is, and I feel like some of the velcro tape might mess up the look for me. I am so shallow :p . The casings on this specific rifle are actually hitting the charging handle on ejection, it is already marked up a bit.

What scope mount is that driller???

2" or 3" offset?? My Vortex 4-16x has a 4" eye relief and I can't mount sh!t on SAN cuz of it.

I don't know the specific model to be honest. I know it is an American Defense QD one piece mount. Someone else likely will be able to chime in with specific model. It is a 2" offset from middle of scope to scope mount base. Height over bore (HOB) looks like it will be about 3.5". What I do like about this setup is that I can plug in all of the necessary data into my ballistics calculator and use the mil dots on the scope to compensate for bullet drop, whereas some scopes with pre-marked distance hashmarks can be off when you change the bullet weight or HOB from say the HOB of the AR-15 which most battle optics are designed for.

Something I should add as well is that this rifle has way better balance than an XCR or ACR with a heavy barrel. The obvious reason is that the barrel is not heavy profile. I will take pics with the hand guard off as well to show the profile. This gun feels light to me compared to other firearms I have owned. It weighs in at 10 pounds with the optic on it. Not too shabby IMO. My XCR used to weigh about 15 if I remember correctly. Another thing is that this stock is not flimsy, I feel like I could beat something with it, which is a drastic change from the FAST stock and ACR stock.
 
Last edited:
I like where this thread is going!

And bfiles, that's definitely a 3" ADM Recon X mount. I've had both the 3" and the 2" offset, and liked em both. Sounds like you need a scope with more eye relief!

The other slightly silly trick is to flip the whole assembly around and mount it forwards...
 
^^^^
I just ordered a 2" ADM-X mount and I hope this will be the trick otherwise you are right TVPP and I'll need to buy a new scope then.

Problem is my eye is way to close to the scope no matter how far forward I mount it. I just hope this 2" offset will move it that bit more forward for proper eye relief
 
^^^^
I just ordered a 2" ADM-X mount and I hope this will be the trick otherwise you are right TVPP and I'll need to buy a new scope then.

Problem is my eye is way to close to the scope no matter how far forward I mount it. I just hope this 2" offset will move it that bit more forward for proper eye relief

Wait, too close?! That says to me like you need more offset!
 
Yeah my face is too close to the scope to see properly thru it. So I either have to push my head all the way back to the end of the stock or mount the scope as far forward as possible. Me thinks a 2" may not do it now.
Should have bought the 3"
 
Back
Top Bottom