nomad 68
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
This comment is evidence of such ignorance that it would be laughable if it wasn't so retarded.
This. I had to read what he said three times to make sure I wasn't hallucinating.
This comment is evidence of such ignorance that it would be laughable if it wasn't so retarded.
Because it's so easy to find a bear's den.
I'd much rather head out on snowshoes in the mountains with the dogs than sit in a tree watching a garbage can.
To me it is fair chase or no chase. I want the animal to at least have a chance to escape. Shooting a hibernating bear is not exactly fair...........jmho
I'd like to see you meet BigUglyMan. You'd be in for a surprise and education.
This comment is evidence of such ignorance that it would be laughable if it wasn't so retarded.
If this ever happens I will go back to being a Poacher as I was wen I was Younger you are talking about full English colonialism
I was one of those kids that would clime a fenc and sneak around hunting on peoples farms set snares for deer and coyotes he'll I would jump a fence to shoot a rabbit I hated fences still do but I keep off private property we Evan jumped a fence and steal cattle when it was raining ,man I was a bad kid Haahaa
but I'm older now and dot do those thing anymore but have no problem with poaching wen it come to English colonial landlords
Not funny, not right, disturbing, sociopathic, and probably just a load of BS.The first on I see with a tag in the ear or a caw bell I'm going to shoot the thing and it won't be poaching it will be a mercy killing haha
it was over 37 years a go and those farmers are long dead now
the farmers we rustled cows from would give us native kids a hard time so we look at it as getting even
Now that I'm thinking about it over 40 years I kind of mist my cattle rustling days the crazy stuff we did when we were younger Haahaa
I try to keep an open mind on here, everyone has their own experiences and opinions. But you by your own admission, are a first class a$$hole.
Agreed, but theft and disregard for property is not subject to perspective. That is what gets me, if you can laugh about missing the good old days of being a cattle thief sorry no good in my books. Or society, or the law, for that matter.CarverK is native from what I can ascertain... I am still trying to assess whether he is deliberately trolling all of you (by his unusually high usage of the whole colonialist insults) or if he genuinely, from a FN perspective sees things another way.
CarverK is native from what I can ascertain... I am still trying to assess whether he is deliberately trolling all of you (by his unusually high usage of the whole colonialist insults) or if he genuinely, from a FN perspective sees things another way.
I'm sorry my comments wear taken the wrong way I have removed them and I am apologizing for
it
Not the first time my sence of hummer has gotten me into truble sorry guys
Originally Posted by carverk View Post
If this ever happens I will go back to being a Poacher as I was wen I was Younger you are talking about full English colonialism
I was one of those kids that would clime a fenc and sneak around hunting on peoples farms set snares for deer and coyotes he'll I would jump a fence to shoot a rabbit I hated fences still do but I keep off private property we Evan jumped a fence and steal cattle when it was raining ,man I was a bad kid Haahaa
but I'm older now and dot do those thing anymore but have no problem with poaching wen it come to English colonial landlords
When you drive past miles of wheat and canola fields and see nothing but plowed dirt...and then you drive by a few quarters of bush with some deer and moose amongst the sea of agriculture you'll know who owns the wildlife. Get it now Gatehouse?? When you own the land you decide what lives or dies. Like it or not...it's my wildlife. That's where it is, that's where it lives, and that's how it is, partner.
Bottom line here is that the state of Alaska will decide what behaviour to sanction regarding wildlife and legallity surrouding the use of or misuse of such resources. Really doesn't matter what any of us think. No one here I presume has any authority to sign a bill into law so we are just spectators.
We can however to a limited degree influence policy and law in our own country, province, or municipality. The best chance you have is to become a property owner. Private property rights are some of the strongest in the country. The next best chance you have to influence outcomes in society is to be a lawmaker. If you aren't already one of those things then become a millionaire. You will have the best chance of getting what you want when you want it if you become all three.
That being said, if I was all three, people would have to pay the market price to kill wildlife. No more $30 tags. That's one of the reasons we have people killing bears in their dens. Makes no sense to me a rancher can complain to the wildlife department and next thing you know they're culling $20,000-$40,000 grizzly bears to save a few $1500-2000 cows. Or selling significantly more moose tags then there are moose when they could sell less tags for $5000 each and have more moose to breed and eventually build up the wildlife fund to a point that they can actually have some revenue to reinvest in wildlife management, enforcement and habitat acquisition.
Unfortunately wildlife is the only department not run like a business. Agriculture, mining, forestry and every other department is. It's about time we start valuing our wildlife and maybe there will be enough for everyone. When a rancher is getting $4000 US for a black bear hunt plus $500 for a gall bladder and $5000 US for a white tailed deer or mule deer, or $10,000 for an elk or moose he isn't going to complain about losing a few acres to wildlife damage or a couple calves to predation is he? Nope, he's going to take a different approach and protect those animals that are worth the most. In this case the wildlife that inhabits his land. But he's not going to protect the wildlife unless it's worth something to him. Right now wildlife is just a liability.
If you're still thinking you won't be able to afford to hunt you're wrong. You will be able to. As price goes up more people will take an interest in conserving or producing wildlife and the price will come down and quality will go up. Just like any other good sold in market. As demand goes up so does production. These morons who manage our wildlife take a differenent approach. As wildlife goes down so do hunting opportunities. Every other industry would find a way to increase production (wildlife population) to meet demand, but not our idiot government. So thus, I must become a landowner and produce my own wildlife to meet my own demands of quality and quantity. A very expensive passion indeed.