Am I the only one who that thinks the "DMR this" and "DMR that" in the revised list of selling features from M+M was actually meant as tongue-in-cheek humour? It may have been poor humour that missed the mark with many, but does anyone else believe that the entire "DMR" tallk was simply self-depreciating humour from M+M? That's my take on it, as there are simply too many outright silly aspects to the "revised" features for them to be anything but a lame joke that backfired because a bunch of overly-serious Canucks took them seriously. People on here keep trying to use those joke "DMR features" as proof of M+M's incompetence, when the joke is actually on them.....
While it could have been a possibility I think the review posted by NS clearly points to M+M is pushing a precision/DMR/Match marketing ploy. They're trying to sell that angle hard.
It will be interesting to see if a CGNer buys one of these rifles and posts an honest review of the gun.
If anyone is in the NCR/Petawawa area I'd be happy to test my XCR against one (and spring for drinks afterwards).
I did a quick look into the background of the guy writing the M10x's review. First thing that came up.
I don't feel he's exactly impartial.I am a creative director and advertising photographer living in Nashville, Tennessee. I create ad campaigns,
Last edited: