Presales without a guaranteed delivery date should be banned.
Presales without a guaranteed delivery date should be banned.
Presales without a guaranteed delivery date should be banned.
Why?
If the customer chooses to place an order without a guaranteed delivery date, that is the customer's decision.
The attraction for the dealer is obvious. Known sales prior to bringing in inventory.
Of course, there is all sorts of potential for problems.
Interminable whinethreads can result.
These promotions are allowed - but the customer must understand what he is getting into.
Yeah I hate free market capitalism too. Government needs to step in and regulate NR black gun market!
Are the same promotions allowed in the EE by private parties?
Why? We all know the risk factor. We all know delays are possible.
I agree that pre-sales where you pay FULL price up front like the BCL 102 should not happen. I will never participate in a scheme like that.
However in this case, where a miniscule $100 deposit is held at the dealer to simply secure you're place in line, I see nothing wrong with it. It's a simple, low risk way of showing the manufacturer that people are indeed interested and willing to support their upcoming product.
However there are no regulations regarding the issue so it is up to the consumer to decide if they see the terms and risk factor of the pre-sale as being something they wish to be a part of or not.
I don't agree that pre-sales should be banned or even regulated for that matter. The last thing this industry needs is more regulations.
The consumer should be the regulator by deciding if they see it fit to lay out what is asked of them. We are free to choose.
As we have seen, a retailer can back out or mess up and never provide the product and simply issue a refund.
But if the buyer decides not to follow through there is usually a fee to pull out or deposit is simply forfeit.
Seems like a lot of people are fine with not being on the same footing as the retailer when things go wrong by the response here
Why? We all know the risk factor. We all know delays are possible.
I agree that pre-sales where you pay FULL price up front like the BCL 102 should not happen. I will never participate in a scheme like that.
However in this case, where a miniscule $100 deposit is held at the dealer to simply secure you're place in line, I see nothing wrong with it. It's a simple, low risk way of showing the manufacturer that people are indeed interested and willing to support their upcoming product.
However there are no regulations regarding the issue so it is up to the consumer to decide if they see the terms and risk factor of the pre-sale as being something they wish to be a part of or not.
I don't agree that pre-sales should be banned or even regulated for that matter. The last thing this industry needs is more regulations.
The consumer should be the regulator by deciding if they see it fit to lay out what is asked of them. We are free to choose.
Absolutely not. Item must be in the physical possession of the private seller - with one exception that you will see if you consult the rules.
We're only talking about $100 here...![]()
Who asked for government involvement?
it already is regulated on the EE of this forum.I don't agree that pre-sales should be banned or even regulated for that matter. The last thing this industry needs is more regulations.
Who do you expect would regulate such a ban?
It's not like the modern hunter where there was a presale before frt was finalized and then having to wait for parts to come in.
It's nice to see some that get it.Yeah I hate free market capitalism too. Government needs to step in and regulate NR black gun market!
Because like it or not the Canadian consumer actually needs a little protection from shady business practices. That's why we have rules in regards to credit cards and interest, rent increases, auto warranty, gift card expiration dates, fast food calorie counts, etc.