Thank you very much, that's good to know! Now I just need to find the right one! So many options, it's overwhelming! CheersSame.
Having tried both LPVO all day long (as opposed to red dot and magnifier)
Thank you very much, that's good to know! Now I just need to find the right one! So many options, it's overwhelming! CheersSame.
Having tried both LPVO all day long (as opposed to red dot and magnifier)
The higher the magnification range, the more $$$ you'll need to get decent glass.A 1-4 is not going to be that much cheaper or smaller then a 1-6 or even a 1-8...... I'd rather shoot a 1-8 at 6 power then a 1-6 at 6 power.
That said, if your budget it tight a 1-6 will be fine. 1-4 is a bit old school these days.... optics have advanced a fair bit in the last 15 years or so!
9mm PCC is not the best "percision" rig, I think they are more suited to ringing steel gongs, and shooting clay pigeon sized targets out to 100 yards,
Oh ya I just looked into the Delta Stryker, out I'd my budget! Very nice though! I'd like to pay $500 ballpark.The higher the magnification range, the more $$$ you'll need to get decent glass.
As for LPVO choice, you'd want something that has great 1X performance and a dot that is daylight bright.
It certainly isn't cheap, but the Delta Stryker 1-6 is pretty nice IMO
I find with cheaper optics that the worst setting is the max magnification, things look better to my eyes below max magnification.Thanks for your reply.
Can I ask you why a 1-8 set at 6 would be better than a 1-6 at 6?
You're last paragraph make me think that maybe a red dot is better suited for a PCC then...
Thank you that makes a lot of sense what you are saying about the optics at max.I find with cheaper optics that the worst setting is the max magnification, things look better to my eyes below max magnification.
9mm PCC's are fun guns to me and I prefer shooting them off hand at reactive targets... not something I would sit at a bench with other then sighting in. You've allready got a red dot so you can try that anytime.
Thank you for pitching in. If I end up with a scope, it will be a 1-6x24 as well. CheersI put a 1-6x24 illuminated reticle Bushnell prime or something on mine. Feels like it matches.
Yes indeed, i had a swapped mk2 a while backOh ya I just looked into the Delta Stryker, out I'd my budget! Very nice though! I'd like to pay $500 ballpark.
VRT as of VR6 turbo or?
I have a Corrado VR6...
What are you planning on using it for is the big question...Hello everyone,
After reading for a while on this forum, I decided to join and here's my first post!
I just put a deposit on a Sterling Arms PCC R9. There's not much you can buy these days and I'd like to find an activity to do with my son. 9mm sounds fun and still "cheap" to operate so I went for it. There's lots of other models that were on my list but ya, there's nothing much else to buy so... Anyways it looks PROMISING and it's Canadian based too.
So my question, since I'm new to PCC, is what kind if scope you guys would recommend? I'd like to spend 4 to $500 max. Newbie questions are, is it just a red dot carbine or can I put a scope on it and if so how many times it should be on a PCC? Or better with a red dot combined with a 3x magnifier?
Thanks in advance! Cheers
You keep bringing the goods!Could also try one of these by Discovery Optics. Chinese made but by all accounts a lot of scope/features for the money. Also has a full warranty apparently.
https://www.discoveryopt.com/DISCOVERYOPT-ED-AR-1-8X24IR-FFP-Optics-Scopes.html
I bought a 4-16 FFP 30mm tube scope from them to try out for $89.95 USD delivered. Came with rings, sun shade, lens caps and throw lever. Took 2 months to arrive (during post strike) but arrive it did! I emailed a couple of times over that period and always got a response.
I swapped out the rings for a mount, but otherwise I’ve been pretty impressed. Glass is very good quality (as good if not better than my Burris/Vortex scopes) and build quality too. Has exposed turrets with positive clicks. Had it out in the snow a couple weeks ago and it got pretty covered but held up great.
I bought it out of curiosity - already had a scope more than twice the price on that particular rifle and didn’t need it -but I’ll be keeping it on there now.
Discount codes also abound on internet providing a further 10% off, meaning you should be able to pick one up for ~$250 CAD delivered.![]()
Thank you for your comment, I appreciate the knowledge pouring in, this is very helpful. See, because I'm new to this I never thought a 9mm would be a good choice for less than 100 yrs. I'm starting to think more and more about a cheaper optic in the 1-6 range and I do have my red dot which is also a middle of the road. I'll be able to shoot with both and not break the bank. Once I figure out my preference, I could always upgrade. Thanks for your timeWhat are you planning on using it for is the big question...
If you are plinking out to 100yrds or so, get a cheap lpvo. You are not going to be shooting much accuracy with a sterling R9 out past say 75yrd. So dumping $ into an expensive distance optic is rather pointless. 9mm opens up from a dinner plate to a barn door at or past 100
If you are thinking of competition use (steel challenge, IPSC, etc), put a red dot in it. Can't run magnified optics in PCC division (what's left of it).
Find an optic that fits your needs, and your wallet. They are out there, and you don't need to spend thousands to get serviceable glass for a PCC
ACD
I agree with you, they and you are sure bringing good points. I will look into the Victor optics you are suggesting, that one and the one Morp suggested seems like a really good bang for your buck. Thanks for helping me out with my decision, much appreciated!Morp and Alpha Charlie bring up good points about budget optics out to 150 yards or so, there are some pretty nice budget 1-6 optics out there.
I picked up a couple inexpensive S6 vector/victor 1-6 scopes a couple years ago for and they look surprisingly good, the reticle choices out there will be another consideration but you won't really know what you like till you try some. If it's illuminated , I prefer just the dot or a circle dot illumination and don't like optics that light up the hold over points or an entire "Christmas tree"!
The S6 has a Christmas Tree style reticle but the main aimpoint is more circle dot and stands out clearly, I have heard people here on CGN that really like the Vector Prism optics as well but I have not tried them.
![]()
That primary arms Nova you linked to looks like a nice option for a clean hunting type reticle, simple basic hold overs and a nice crisp dot center aim point,
![]()
Thread hijack. Sorry, just to be clear, the condition is called, "astigmatism" not "a stigmatism"it’s a tough little optic and an etched reticle is great if you have a stigmatism also real nice t
I did the exact opposite. LPVO are fine if the gun only ever gets shot at paper on a range. However in the field, in the real world, LPVO suck because the reticle illumination is just not bright enough. Standing in sun and looking into shadows at a target that is not white causes the reticle to disappear. Not good if you need to be able to engage a target quickly. Red dots have their limitations but at least the dot can always be seen regardless of lighting conditions or target colour.I'm slowly converting all my red dots to lpvo
I agree with you, as far as red dot go, Romeo 5 is top of the lift for best bang for your buck. I did bought one for my Sig Sauer PCP air gunCabelas currently has the Sig Romeo5x on sale for $200. There is no better sight for the money than the Romeo5.
https://www.cabelas.ca/category/red-dot-sights/1479?brand=SIG SAUER
The Sig Romeo5 gets stellar reviews all over the internets.
You're bringing a good point here with your explanation of outdoor vs indoor. I can see that! I might just get a cheapo 1-6 and I have my Romeo 5, that would cover everything... Thanks!I did the exact opposite. LPVO are fine if the gun only ever gets shot at paper on a range. However in the field, in the real world, LPVO suck because the reticle illumination is just not bright enough. Standing in sun and looking into shadows at a target that is not white causes the reticle to disappear. Not good if you need to be able to engage a target quickly. Red dots have their limitations but at least the dot can always be seen regardless of lighting conditions or target colour.
I had an expensive Leupold LPVO on the rifle I use at the ranch, which is a heavily wooded area. Very quickly I learned that any non-white target hiding or moving in the shadows would completely obscure the reticle making it impossible to aim properly. The truth is that in the real world, shots will likely never exceed 100 yds and more likely be around 25 yds or less.You're bringing a good point here with your explanation of outdoor vs indoor. I can see that! I might just get a cheapo 1-6 and I have my Romeo 5, that would cover everything... Thanks!