I have had many gut splitting laughs on your behalf,thanks!! What seems so simple for many is rocket science to others. I wonder if most realize how small the powder charge in rimfire rounds actually is??You just give it a shake.
I have had many gut splitting laughs on your behalf,thanks!! What seems so simple for many is rocket science to others. I wonder if most realize how small the powder charge in rimfire rounds actually is??You just give it a shake.
When I disassembled a bunch of CCI SV rounds to see what the variance in weight was like among the various components I believe I found all the charges were basically the same at 1.0 grains with any difference too small for my cheap scale to detect. The difference in the brass/primer was pretty small. And the majority of the overall weight variance was in the bullets.I have had many gut splitting laughs on your behalf,thanks!! What seems so simple for many is rocket science to others. I wonder if most realize how small the powder charge in rimfire rounds actually is??
I take it s a yes. Don't skimp. Bring your 100000+ rifle and your custom semi. After all, I'm not challenging your rifle. I'm challenging you. This way you get a chance to humiliate me twice.Im looking into obtaining a decoder manual lol. Im quite confident that in a year or two youll have all the vagaries of rimfire sorted out and with all the magical weighing,sorting ,sizing whatever your cci standard will beat lot matched ammo in a $10,000 plus rifle? Ill make it interesting and bring my custom semi instead. Itll be fun
As a 70 year old, obviously I'm the fudd.Exactly whos the fudd and whos the expert?
OP, keep in mind that with .22LR match ammo rim thickness variation or sorting by weight has no significant (measurable to the average shooter) impact on accuracy performance.Please, show me one, just ONE test where matching rim thickness or even just sorting by weight showed decrease in accuracy. Till than, you are full of opinion and nothing more than that...
Instead of having a box good for punching paper, you end up with a box for paper and a bonus box for shooting cans.Why? If a box of non-match .22LR ammo is sorted so that half of them shoot much better, where's the big gain over buying match ammo costing twice the non-match?
To get a box of better stuff you have to still pay for the not-so-good stuff. In other words, you buy more, you pay more.Instead of having a box good for punching paper, you end up with a box for paper and a bonus box for shooting cans.
Like you, been there, done that... even became a lapua dealer to get more options for testing in hopes, to find an answer to the riddle. That was expensive.Ive experimented just about every way possible with rimfire guns to try and cypher what I can control and cant. After lots of failed experiments and futile efforts I came to realize, its a great gun and a great lot number. Thats it basically. If you can match the two it can be an amazing thing! Others will try all the same shxt thats been tried soooh many times. The results will be the same. Failure. But hey lettem have fun and get excited and some day ,20,30,40 years later realize its what we tried to tell them. Remember the rimfire bullet that was gonna change the rimfire world, I laughed my ass off listening to all the hype. Anybody heard of it,in the last year and a half.
Instead of having a box good for punching paper, you end up with a box for paper and a bonus box for shooting cans.
Guys, it's all great input and I appreciate it. Unfortunately, you may be misinterpreting what I'm after. Maybe because, I never really stated it.Like you, been there, done that... even became a lapua dealer to get more options for testing in hopes, to find an answer to the riddle. That was expensive.
Then one day, I saw charts on how one of the big ammo makers made, sorted and then graded ammo. Wish I had seen this well before going down all those rabbit holes.... and it sure answered alot of questions.
Simply put... the best ammo the sporting industry can acquire at their highest price... is the first falldown grade the manf didn't want!
And it only gets worst from there.
the US stuff is more diplomatic... its all made to lower standards, no need to try and find the better stuff cause there isn't any.
I know so many still cling onto finding a solution but if/when they realise the ammo we get, regardless of what and how much, is actually quite crappy, SOOOO many things make sense.
but I suspect, years from now, posts like this will continue with shooters claiming, they have a way to make crap better.
In the centerfire world, very few top competitors would use mass produced factory ammo and expect performance to exceed what is possible in handloading. It is used typically for convenience or 'good enough' performance.
in rimfire, this reality seems to have been forgotten with the quest to find the 'holy grail' that can provide that winning advantage. My rimfire competition was limited to PRS cause I saw no point in other accuracy games when you had no idea what would happen on the next shot. At least in PRS, the gongs were big enough that the flyer had a decent chance of still hitting the intended target.
YMMV
Jerry
Sorry - I only realized after that this was a rimfire discussion. I thought it was centerfire we were talking about.Out of curiousity how was the powder weight checked?
You guys should do a Project Mapleseed contest.Ah, Longstuf (sorry if I don't remember exactly your handle), why don't we make our challenge a bit more manly. We do our shootout not from the bench but free standing? After all, I'm not challenging your guns but challenging you...
We are in good company... LOLAs a 70 year old, obviously I'm the fudd.
I was getting Eley Sport for half the cost of CCI SV. Made the 1/2" challenge with it.Guys, it's all great input and I appreciate it. Unfortunately, you may be misinterpreting what I'm after. Maybe because, I never really stated it.
Here it goes:
I'm not trying to make the cheapest ammo to perform on a level with the most expensive one. That is simply unrealistic and you really don't have to prove it to me.
I'm looking for a way to get inexpensive ammo (maybe CCI sv but just maybe) to perform on a par ( hopefully better) with the rejects from the, say, Eley. Let's face it; Does paying 3 times more for Eley Team (bottom of the barrel rejects from Eley) than you pay for run of the mill CCI sv make sense?
I'm not looking for ultimate accuracy.
I have a cheap (to many of you) T1x MTR. I have an old Nikon scope on it. I got a factory grip and beavertail forearm and a cheap Amazon bipod for it. I made and fitted a muzzle break for it only because I didn't like the plastic protector. This is as far as the mods will go on this rifle.
Now, I do realize that feeding it top shelf ammo would result in the best results. I also realize that, more than likely, it's not the ammo that is going to be the limiting factor. It's me.
In other words, think of me as of a guy who wants to squeeze as much accuracy out of a cheap setup as possible.
Ah, Longstuf (sorry if I don't remember exactly your handle), why don't we make our challenge a bit more manly. We do our shootout not from the bench but free standing? After all, I'm not challenging your guns but challenging you...
I can strongly suggest getting a couple of lot numbers of SK long range. This has shot surprisingly well in a number of match chamber Euro rifles.Guys, it's all great input and I appreciate it. Unfortunately, you may be misinterpreting what I'm after. Maybe because, I never really stated it.
Here it goes:
I'm not trying to make the cheapest ammo to perform on a level with the most expensive one. That is simply unrealistic and you really don't have to prove it to me.
I'm looking for a way to get inexpensive ammo (maybe CCI sv but just maybe) to perform on a par ( hopefully better) with the rejects from the, say, Eley. Let's face it; Does paying 3 times more for Eley Team (bottom of the barrel rejects from Eley) than you pay for run of the mill CCI sv make sense?
I'm not looking for ultimate accuracy.
I have a cheap (to many of you) T1x MTR. I have an old Nikon scope on it. I got a factory grip and beavertail forearm and a cheap Amazon bipod for it. I made and fitted a muzzle break for it only because I didn't like the plastic protector. This is as far as the mods will go on this rifle.
Now, I do realize that feeding it top shelf ammo would result in the best results. I also realize that, more than likely, it's not the ammo that is going to be the limiting factor. It's me.
In other words, think of me as of a guy who wants to squeeze as much accuracy out of a cheap setup as possible.
Ah, Longstuf (sorry if I don't remember exactly your handle), why don't we make our challenge a bit more manly. We do our shootout not from the bench but free standing? After all, I'm not challenging your guns but challenging you...




























