SKS confession

cannonfodder said:
Ardent7,
I'm confused? In a previous past you state that the 6ppc catridge originates from the 7.62x39. In your last post you state that the 6ppc has nothing to do with the 7.62x39 catridge. In the very next sentence you negate your own words by again indicating that the 6ppc is indeed BASED upon the 7.62x39 catridge. In regards to their efficiency, I did not contest. The reliability of the cartridge has little to do with its accuracy. as far as being easier on guns, I agree. Lower velocities, lower pressures will definitely increase life of the platform being used.

Actually, I said;

Lets go with the 6PPC has nothing to do with 7.62X39. The 6PPC case is a blown out and necked down 7.62X39. Basic case geometry is still in keeping so far as base diameter and length, and the .30 bore and flat base bullets actually make for an excellent cartridge, not that far off from the .30 BR in a proper gun, which there are VERY few of.

Nowhere do I even come remotely close to saying they have nothing in common, in fact I see the entire section as an argument as to why they have so much in common. Reading for your own meanings I suppose. :)



Your cost comparison is something I fail to follow?

This is quite simple too; your comment is the stem of my response, I simply entered and countered your argument from the cost perspective.

Here is the comment I was addressing;

Comparing the SKS to say the AR platform is really like apples to oranges. One does the job, and one does the job very well.

And how I addressed it...

the SKS is no AR. Certainly not, you're quite right. The price tags certainly don't match either, do they?

Now how much do my AR's cost me on average? Lets see, one's $1800, and one's $6000, and... Do they shoot that many multiples better than my $320 Yugo SKS? Hell no. Granted, my $6000 AR is fitted with a grenade launcher, then again so is the Yugo SKS I compare it to...

I fail to see where this doesn't correlate and my argument appears quite a logical progression, even on the third reading... :confused:

Beyond this, I'm afraid, and perhaps already, this is just going to be a big mudslinging party, that I'd prefer not to be a part of. Call it backing out, ignornace, whatever really, I'm just about done here however and I've probably over involved myself in an argument destined to go nowhere as it is. ;)

Cheers and good shooting. :)
 
cannonfodder said:
On a side note, the flower in Panzerslob 2's avatar is indeed the Swiss/Austrian/German edelweiss. In German it means noble(edel) white(weiss). The flower was given to German and Austrian mountain or Alpine soldiers for bravery. Definitely a sign of masculinity if you ask me. As is often the case around here. Don't s**t talk that you know nothing about.
Ahhhh, it's an edelweiss flower, well that's great. It doesn't change the fact that panzerslob2 offered no useful contribution to the topic at hand, or anything useful to any other topic for that matter. His name is panzerslob2 (german for "armour" but also a synonym for "tank" since WWII) and he has an edelweiss medal as his avatar. Hmmmmm. I don't get it :confused: How can one be an "armoured slob" and yet deserve a medal for bravery, especially with the crap he likes to post? Anyone who had any respect for such symbols and meanings wouldn't behave in such a way.

Just for posterity (and to further prove my point), here's a PM he sent me a little while ago;
panzerslob2 said:
Telling a little boy how it is
Hey goof, you'll never have the balls to go get a flower like that one.I have a dry one that I picked myself so before you go flapping your lips about a silly little flower go do something for your country istead spending all day on gunnutz, Where did your mother and I go wrong, raising such a goofy boy like yourself so lighten up clown!
What is this garbage? Who talks like this? Where does this crap come from?? Seriously. GO AWAY PANZERSLOB2, YOU'RE NOT WELCOME!!!
 
Last edited:
I shot and examined in detail an SKS for the first time today, it was a Chinese SKS D. First impression was that it was a nice little carbine with good blue and nice wood, on close inspection I found that it was every bit as good as what it appeared to be. I did not get the oportunity to shoot it from a bench rest, but at close range shooting off hand it was every bit as good as my 858. It also had a very nice trigger and sights. I am well impressed, and this ( from what many say ) is the lowliest SKS of all !!
 
Ardent7,
let me quote you: " Lets go with the 6PPC has nothing to do with 7.62X39." Then you make this statement:"The 6PPC case is a blown out and necked down 7.62X39." Your first sentence says the 6ppc has nothing to do with 7.62x39, then you continue to say it does.

The counter from the cost perspective is one that you interjected without provocation. I'm compelled to believe that such an argument is the only one which bears any weight when comparing the SKS to the AR platform. Yes, for the cost comparison the SKS does what it was supposed to do and does it at a bargain. Again, I in no way used the monetary value of the two as any sort of basis regarding quality or value.

"Now how much do my AR's cost me on average? Lets see, one's $1800, and one's $6000, and... Do they shoot that many multiples better than my $320 Yugo SKS? Hell no. Granted, my $6000 AR is fitted with a grenade launcher, then again so is the Yugo SKS I compare it to... "

This statement simply proves that not I, but you, are the one who associates monetary cost/value with quality. This statement from what I read is nothing more than an attempt at "proving" that you can and do own "quality" firearms based on what you paid for them. As I mentioned above, it is not dollar value that necessarily dictates quality. Rhineland arms is a prime example. $600 bucks for a rifle that doesn't work, with what some feel is a marginal stock, average trigger, and a tendency to be very picky about what you feed it. Compare that with a Ruger 10/22 for half the price that eats almost anything you feed it, fuctions reliably and can be tuned up as much as desired.

Poweredbybeer,
I agree with you, it appears as though Panzerslob2 is nothing but a #### disturber who has little to contribute to a discussion let alone contribute a civilized mature comment. regardless of why he chooses the Edelweiss or whether or not he has ever served is irrelevent. Playing his game and slinging mud in what is quickly descending into an adolescent screaming match is neither mature nor a valuable contribution to this or any other thread. My advice is to ignore people like this, sooner or later they either smarten up or leave.

CF
 
Last edited:
This is an email that was posted on another forum i browse.
Notice what they say about the .223........

Hello to all my fellow gunners, military buffs, veterans and interested
guys. A couple of weekends ago I got to spend time with my son Jordan, who
was on his first leave since returning from Iraq. He is well (a little
thin), and already bored. He will be returning to Iraq for a second tour in
early 06 and has already re-enlisted early for 4 more years. He loves the
Marine Corps and is actually looking forward to returning to Iraq.
Jordan spent 7 months at Camp Blue Diamond in Ramadi. Aka: Fort Apache.
He saw and did a lot and the following is what he told me about weapons,
equipment, tactics and other miscellaneous info which may be of interest to
you. Nothing is by any means classified. No politics here, just a Marine
with a birds eye views opinions:

1) The M-16 rifle : Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the
talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you
feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine
version is more popular because its lighter and shorter, but it has jamming
problems also. They like the ability to mount the various optical gunsights
and weapons lights on the picattiny rails, but the weapon itself is not
great in a desert environment. They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor
penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso
hits cant be reliably counted on to put the enemy down. Fun fact: Random
autopsies on dead insurgents shows a high level of opiate use.

2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine
gun. Big thumbs down. Universally considered a piece of ####. Chronic
jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly. (that fun in
the middle of a firefight).

3) The M9 Beretta 9mm: Mixed bag. Good gun, performs well in desert
environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for
self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the 9mm: Bad guys
hit multiple times and still in the fight.

4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for
clearing houses to good effect.

5) The M240 Machine Gun: 7.62 Nato (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun,
developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!).
Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts em down. Originally
developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted
and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up the structure
over there.

6) The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun: Thumbs way, way up. Ma deuce is
still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper,
puts their dicks in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon in-theater.

7) The .45 pistol: Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there.
Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one.
With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put em down with a torso
hit. The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK
military model and supposedly love it. The old government model .45s are
being re-issued en masse.

8) The M-14: Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a
modified version to special ops guys. Modifications include lightweight
Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the
sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round.

9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle: Thumbs way up. Spectacular range
and accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out
vehicle suicide bombers ( we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded
enemy. Definitely here to stay.

10) The M24 sniper rifle: Thumbs up. Mostly in .308 but some in 300 win
mag. Heavily modified Remington 700s. Great performance. Snipers have been
used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it that a marine sniper on his third
tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcocks record for
confirmed kills with OVER 100.

11) The new body armor: Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs.
and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an
AK-47 round. The bad news: Hot as #### to wear, almost unbearable in the
summer heat (which averages over 120 degrees). Also, the enemy now goes for
head shots whenever possible. All the bull#### about the old body armor
making our guys vulnerable to the IEDs was a non-starter. The IED explosions
are enormous and body armor doesn't make any difference at all in most
cases.

12) Night Vision and Infrared Equipment: Thumbs way up. Spectacular
performance. Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period. Very little
enemy action after evening prayers. More and more enemy being whacked at
night during movement by our hunter-killer teams. Weve all seen the videos.

13) Lights: Thumbs up. Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights
are Surefires, and the troops love em. Invaluable for night urban
operations. Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it.

I cant help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and
ordnance are 50 or more years old!!!!!!!!! With all our technology, its the
WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!!!! The infantry fighting
is frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

Bad guy weapons:

1) Mostly AK47s . The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the
desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably. PKM belt fed
light machine guns are also common and effective. Luckily, the enemy mostly
shoots like ####. Undisciplined spray and pray type fire. However, they are
seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles. (Iran,
again) Fun fact: Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the marksmanship
of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told in Jihad
school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily
beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Lets just say
they know better now.

2) The RPG: Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys.
Simple, reliable and as common as dog####. The enemy responded to our
up-armored humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range.
Still killing a lot of our guys.

3) The IED: The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet
anti-armor mines to jury rigged artillery shells. A lot found in Jordans
area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3 155mm artillery
shells and wire them together. Most were detonated by cell phone, and the
explosions are enormous. You're not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank.
Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there. Lately,
they are much more sophisticated shape charges (Iranian) specifically
designed to penetrate armor. Fact: Most of the ready made IEDs are supplied
by Iran, who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to train the
insurgents in their use and tactics. Thats why the attacks have been so
deadly lately. Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest being
shape charges in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the
cinderblocks that litter all Iraqi roads. We find about 40% before they
detonate, and the bomb disposal guys are unsung heroes of this war.

4) Mortars and rockets: Very prevalent. The soviet era 122mm rockets
(with an 18km range) are becoming more prevalent. One of Jordans NCOs lost a
leg to one. These weapons cause a lot of damage inside the wire. Jordans
base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and rocket fire,
often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue (It did). More of
a psychological weapon than anything else. The enemy mortar teams would jump
out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul ass in a matter of
seconds.

5) Bad guy technology: Simple yet effective. Most communication is by
cell and satellite phones, and also by email on laptops. They use handheld
GPS units for navigation and Google earth for overhead views of our
positions. Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their
explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE. Night vision is rare.
They are very careless with their equipment and the captured GPS units and
laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.
 
Interesting, but these are one soldiers personal experiences. So the AR platform has more issues in the ####ty environment. So what. No one said they could handle everything. All mechanical devices require maintnence. I still don't see your point HUSS? The facts about the 308/7.62x51(not the russian 308, which would be 7.62x39 or x54. 308 refers to the name of an AMERICAN catridge, not the calibre of a russian machine gun. ) are old news. 556 will not penetrate dense mediums such as cinder blocks at all. Nothing new here. the 556 round does a good job for what it was intended to do. It moves fast and does serious damage to those who receive them. Note that the author did mention that often the enemy showed high volumes of opiate in their systems. Maybe this explains some of the multiple hits required to neutralize? 22lr to 50BMG I don't think you or anyone else wants to be shot or shot at. The crazy people we are currently fighting, they're a little different.

CF
 
It all seems pretty relative to me anyway.

Its easy to sit here in Canada and pontificate about what weapon is better than which, but operations on foreign soil are a mucher higher stake game.

One such player is the SAS, who are very fond of the M16 family of weapons. I think few would disagree that they are as involved in high risk operations as anyone is likely to ever dream of.

Yet curiously, they don't seem to echo the dubious recorded shortcommings of the AR nay-sayer crowd. Why do you think this is?



My belief is that the reason is because the M16 is what it is -- a fine small arm for local force protection that requires modest maintenance.

Rather than piddling with schemes to up-calibre the weapon, they rely on heavier weapons to engage at range, just as God intended.



**Edit:

Cannonfodder - One of the interesting forensic characterisitcs of the 5.56mm round is that although it is light, it is a hypervelocity round.

What this means is that it behaves slightly differently than a lower velocity round, in that fragmentation of matter from the bullet core does not reduce the lethality of the round, but rather increases it substantially.

Generally speaking, when a slow fat cartridge enters human tissue it starts dumping its kinetic energy into the body.

As the bullet yaws and begins to fragment, the resulting loss of weight is actually reducing the lethality of the original bullet. It is true that the size of the permanent wound track is greater with the mushrooming, but the fragmenting peices do not have sufficient mass/energy to create independant wound tracks.

However, with the 5.56 x 45mm round, when the cartridge begins to fragment in tissue the individual fragments have enough mass/energy to create temporary wound tracks with an explosive "spider-web" effect known as massive temporary cavitation. Think about the pressure you feel with a cut pulling the skin on your cheek apart, magnify that effect by many simultaneous cuts, add the explosive compression of interstitial fluid blowing that wound cavity open, and you've pretty much got it.

On the other hand, 5.56mm x 45 IS fielded in FMJ, and will resist fragmentation. In the absence of hitting a vital organ and producing an instantaneous kill, or hitting bone and yawing inside the tissue, the round will frequently punch directly through the body without fully transfering the kinetic killing energy of the round.


But I really could be just guessing. My library card is pretty old

;)
 
Last edited:
cannonfodder said:
Poweredbybeer,
I agree with you, it appears as though Panzerslob2 is nothing but a s**t disturber who has little to contribute to a discussion let alone contribute a civilized mature comment. regardless of why he chooses the Edelweiss or whether or not he has ever served is irrelevent. Playing his game and slinging mud in what is quickly descending into an adolescent screaming match is neither mature nor a valuable contribution to this or any other thread. My advice is to ignore people like this, sooner or later they either smarten up or leave.
Good point. Kinda makes me feel stupid for not realizing it a little sooner :redface:

####.

Well, back to the task at hand :D I've kinda lost interest in the discussion unfortunately, and I doubt I'd be able to contribute much anyway. I know basically squat about M-16's, AR-15's etc. and how they work, and I've never fired one, so I can't really speak to the whole AR vs. SKS comparison thing. I've already said what I wanted to say anyway :D I'll leave you guys to it!
 
If your in house to house fighting, don't you want the 7.62? Why the hell doesn't the U.S just simply adopt the modern highly accurate american made AKM's? Politics. Thats why. Whoever in this forum who doesn't go for accurate AK's is lacking common sense.
 
Ardent said:
I do have to compliment cannonfodder's maintained personna, good on you, intelligent arguments, even while I may not agree, you take your time and formulate genuine opinions rather than gibberish insults.

+1 Its nice to be told your wrong(not that i like being wrong) with out being verbally violated.

I guess the point i have been trying to make is that if your shooting for pleasure and accuracy at the range then an AR is your gun.

If your training for a self defense situation then with the cost of an AR being well over $1200 and the fact that it is unlikely you will be shooting out past 50 yards an sks will more then do.
 
HUSS said:
If your training for a self defense situation then with the cost of an AR being well over $1200 and the fact that it is unlikely you will be shooting out past 50 yards an sks will more then do.

You mean out past 200 - 300 yards. :rolleyes: :D
 
cannonfodder said:
I understand that any shooter can poke holes in paper as "evidence" of their accuracy claims. However none of the current SKS shooters who brag about their excellent groupings has yet to post a single picture, fabricated or not. I believe Sparrow even offered to go shoot with another CGN member who preached similar claims of accuracy. As far as I know Sparrow is still waiting for that range date.

Besides someones opinion on another forum regarding the quality of the chinese SKS. What has quality been like for the guns we see?? I believe they have issues with the barrels moving no? How about inconsistent and heavy triggers. Every SKS I've ever fired had a poor trigger and no two were similar. Lets not forget the loose top cover and the difficult mags on the D variants.

I never implied that competition grade firearms were the order of the day. My point was in reference to SKS rifles not being CAPABLE of ever being a comeptition platform due to the fact it was never designed to be one. By that I mean: poor fit(loose tolerances, not always a bad thing) poor finish, and poor materials. The AR platform was never designed to compete either. The AR platform CAN be altered/modified to achieve reasonable levels of accuracy for competition.

At the end of the day the SKS is a simple rifle designed for peasants and does its job well. Comparing the SKS to say the AR platform is really like apples to oranges. One does the job, and one does the job very well.

CF

I have owned and shot a number of Chinese and Russion SKS rifles. Some of these rifles are a great deal more accurate than a mass produced semi auto with surplus ammo should be. One SKS rifle with a tunnel mount would give 1.5 inch groups for about 20 shots before the scope would rattle apart internally or the scope mounts would shake loose. ALL of them shot groups that were three inches or under at 100 metres with the iron sights. And that was using the old copper washed surplus Chinese ammo that went over the chorograph at plus 2600 fps. The ammo was corrosive and it really rattled the action when it cycled.
Good groups in spite of a rather grindy, heavy trigger pull.

And I'm sure you can get SKS rifles that won't consistantly hit a one foot gong at 100 metres, but there are a number of guys in our club that can consistantly hit the silhouette chickens at 200 metres with their SKS rifles.

At first I figured the SKS to be reliable with so so accuracy, but an accurate SKS is a really intersting and fun gun. One that ammo costs allow a lot of practice.

As for most guys who try my SKS rifles, they just want to empty the magazine fast and make noise. They care more about shooting quickly than accurately.
 
Calum said:
You mean out past 200 - 300 yards. :rolleyes: :D

Most gun fights in the u.s where civilians are involed occur at less then 50 yards. Anything further out and its a confrontation you can avoid.
 
HUSS said:
Most gun fights in the u.s where civilians are involed occur at less then 50 yards. Anything further out and its a confrontation you can avoid.

Good stat, and not a bad argument for a short range ranch rifle configuration.

I believe the long distance sniping record in Canada for an actual shoot by police sniper is about 76m. Follows German military doctrine about lack of requirement for scoped rifle based off average engagement ranges being less than 300m in broad gauge. Subsequent weapon designs seem to really reflect this fact as well.


Personally, I prefer having the option to engage at a bit beyond, but do agree that most combat will be chance contact at close ranges. Anything further, and I'd be inclined to box around it.
 
Back
Top Bottom