The 25-06 Remington

About 30 years ago I bought a Ruger no.1 V from a guy in Burnaby, took it to the range on the way home and put a scope on it. Shot 5 of the guys 117 gr. Handloads into a 1/2”. Ever seen what an 87 gr. at 35-3600 does to a varmit?

A 75gr vmax at 3650fps can separate a crows head from its tail by 41' bout all that was left
 
Most 25-06 owners are shooting Hornady 117gr boat tail soft points or 115gr Nosler Partitions (BC .390). 1200 ft lbs energy @ 400y

Compare to a 6.5 PRC 143ELDx (most popular factory load or component bullet, BC .571, retains 1200 ft lbs energy to 710 yards

The 25-06 is a fine cartridge, given its limitations.

You shoot a lot of animals at 700 yards.....
 
Bears are VARMITS ! :p;) lol RJ

Always have been. When I was a young buck I worked with quite a few immigrants from the UK. Most of whom bought acreages. All of whom asked me at one time or another to help them get rid of bears on their property. No tags required for nuisance bears. S3 and done. - dan
 
Works well for bears. Confirmed with these two shot this week. 100gr Barnes TSX at 3400fps+/-, recovered one on a 250 yards raking shot. Lost a petal or 3 gr. A nice high-velocity, low-recoil round. Approved.

7XBl39ul.jpg


gQxahnsl.jpg


fmw2bPRl.jpg
 
Works well for bears. Confirmed with these two shot this week. 100gr Barnes TSX at 3400fps+/-, recovered one on a 250 yards raking shot. Lost a petal or 3 gr. A nice high-velocity, low-recoil round. Approved.

7XBl39ul.jpg


gQxahnsl.jpg


fmw2bPRl.jpg

Had similar success this spring with a 257 Roberts and 100gr TTSX,
 
If nothing else, the use of the 25 cals certainly proves that a 338WM with 250 grain bullets isn't required to shoot a bear. Over head stamped, and all that.

R.
 
Back
Top Bottom