I have the 97 and the MP45. Love them both. Both are 10 round mags.
Trigger wise......one is hammer DA/SA and the other is striker fired. The MP needs the Apex kit, but once in, it feels almost like a polymer 1911 (but not quite.....maybe it's the grip angle too?)
The CZ is a CZ. More accurate than me or anyone else who's shot it. I'm not a fan of the screw in bushing, but I'm not a fan of the 1911 bushing either. It DOES help increase accuracy, as it can be tightened up if needed. Other than that, very mild recoiling owing to the steel frame and very accurate owning to the "slide inside the frame" design. The Jericho is a copy.
I like the 220, but find it's like shooting a 1911 with a DA/SA trigger.
Now if I had to choose, I'd probably go with the MP due to me having wilderness carried it for a few years in the US and appreciate it's light weight, but it's awfully close. Holsters are easier to find as well. One thing to be aware of is that MOST MP45 will have a 1911 style safety on them. Some might even have the magazine disconnect (mine doesn't).
Now to make things more complicated, there is a PPQ in .45 as well in the pipeline.................
This pistol is the top non 1911 45 ACP, i rate it just behind my Les Baer for accuracy... JP.So what is more? the leupold or the HK? Since you have a very top end 1911, how does the trigger compare? Nobody's given me a straight answer on the trigger yet.
Thanks,
CG
It's a little different to my others... Take up is a little creepy, breaks like glass...I really haven't shot it enough to speculate, and I have never shot one with the lem...just read good things..otherwise took me five rounds to figure the sights ( got to cover the target) it's very well balanced, no more muzzle flip than the sig, and comes right back on target...shooting standing...it's funny, it feels special, or maybe it's just the 900$ I paid for it ....lolHeard about the trigger...so what is different? Can't be too bad if you do a 2" hole ( I only can do that with my Kimber 1911 @ 7yd)
CG
So...that's a smith. Tell me more about it!
CG
That looks like DA only...how is the trigger?
CG
I've owned the M&P45, the HK45 and I've fired the FNX. The HK's DA trigger is ugly, the safety/decocker flexes when you use it (it's a fairly thin polymer piece), the gun is very top heavy, too big and the parts are stupid expensive. The FNX's DA trigger is heavy and stacks, but it's better than the HK. The M&P is under rated, I'd pick it before the HK, and because I don't know how they last, or where to get parts or magazines, before the FNX. Glocks in 45 are just ugly to use.
So, that would lead me to the CZ 97...
CG
I have a M&P45, with the Apex trigger kit, that shoots very well. I am very pleased with it and prefer it to my 1911s.
I also have a SIG220. I find it slim, comfortable, with excellent trigger and sights.
Not if you have normal hands and not if you do anything other than stand at a bench and shoot - that damn thing is a boat anchor, one designed for people with large hands. The 45 M&P is very marginally larger - as in you have to measure it - in the grip than the 9, the weight is not silly either. Vickers and Hackathorn have said there are 2 modern 45 pistols worth considering, the HK and the M&P - the HK to me, isn't a good choice (but they helped design it - so it will clearly suit them) leaving the "other one". If you really want an all metal gun, get a Sig 220, probably the best out of the box "metal" 45 made - including the 1911.



























