agreed
If a man has a .260, he will laugh at the 25-06 owner![]()
Sort of like how a man with a .308 will laugh at a .260 owner ??
agreed
If a man has a .260, he will laugh at the 25-06 owner![]()
223
Underperformed / overpopulated for no reason. You can not hunt with that and can't go to defend anything solely based on 223. Vietnam was lost basically due to this and see the guys in Iraq now carrying M1 Gerand for back-ups - Biggs
Edit: Expected it
Well said.
That may be your method but that wasn't what I said. Your method, judgement or just your interpretation??
Sort of like how a man with a .308 will laugh at a .260 owner ??![]()
Sort of like how a man with a .308 will laugh at a .260 owner ??![]()
If the .308 owner laughs at the .260, he just shows his ignorance.![]()
223
Vietnam was lost basically due to this and see the guys in Iraq now carrying M1 Gerand for back-ups - Biggs
If the .308 owner laughs at the .260, he just shows his ignorance.![]()
Just trying to obtain a bit of clarification. I hope not but perhaps it's an acceptable legal method employed in Northern Ontario. Here in B.C., it's stated quite clearly in the regs,
"It's unlawful, # 18, to shoot wildlife from a motor vehicle or a boat propelled by a motor".
I don't know how 'fine' the letter of the law is but that may even include resting or leaning against a vehicle, orusing the door as a rest but that's here, perhaps it's different else where.
So you are saying the .260 owner has already shown his ignorance by laughing at the 25-06 owner ??![]()
wow........just wow223
Underperformed / overpopulated for no reason. You can not hunt with that and can't go to defend anything solely based on 223. Vietnam was lost basically due to this and see the guys in Iraq now carrying M1 Gerand for back-ups - Biggs
Edit: Expected it
Here, you have to be x amount of feet from a travelled portion of a road. Just can't step out of the truck and blast away,"legally". If one had a bird dog in the back, some could fill out their limit without leaving the comforts of the cab. Conservation Officers are about as common as tics on a Lake Trout.
No, because in that case, he is correct to laugh![]()
No, it isn't correct to laugh just because you say it is.
![]()