P.S.S. - This is just a wiener measuring thread anyways.
No, I started this more to stir the spot (quarantine boredom) and because I had a couple chuckle worthy interactions at the gun club of guys being interested in some of my rifles but being intimidated about trying them despite shooting rifles that recoil equally or more.
Had a couple guys shooting their .300 magnums a Weatherby and RUM that were really interested in the .35 Whelen and .38-55 I was shooting, I convinced the RUM owner to try the .38-55 and he couldn't believe how little the trailboss load I was shooting recoiled. The Weatherby owner was adamant it was an elephant gun and we were setting him up. I saw a younger fellow fire a single shot from a 7mm-08 say it was too much and then put 50 rounds through a 6.5 Creedmoor in identical platforms other than scopes, 140ish grain bullets at 2700fps from identical set ups should feel about the same, shouldn't they?
I agree that there is no need to shoot more than you're comfortable with and modern bullets have really changed what rounds are capable of. I was just curious what made things easily masterable in 2005 but excessive today.
I've been working up in the recoil department. Shooting full power loads out of a 338 WIN MAG and 9.3x62 and so far im doing fine. Still produce MOA accuacy on bench. Ive bought a 416 rigby as of recently and plan on mastering its recoil. I'd like taking a spring black bear with it. 350gr TTSX or 400gr Hornady interbonds should do the trick.
On the 416. Personally would recommend a plain jane.....cheap(when discussing 416 rigby its relative) cup n core. Your pushing a slug twice the weight at about 303/308 velocities. Say 24-2500. Its going to shed velocity quick, any shot beyond too close, could be going too slow to expand ideally.
It's funny though, that my 270 seems to kick hard when punching paper, but, not at all when shooting at the front half of a deer. Same goes for 12 gauge. Shooting clays, I can feel my shoulder, but, I can shoot ducks all evening without a twinge.
When? When smart shooters/hunters realized they don't require a heavy recoiling rifle to be a successful shooter/hunter.
On the 416. Personally would recommend a plain jane.....cheap(when discussing 416 rigby its relative) cup n core. Your pushing a slug twice the weight at about 303/308 velocities. Say 24-2500. Its going to shed velocity quick, any shot beyond too close, could be going too slow to expand ideally.
I am a odd ball. I love recoil, just love it. If it doesn't give you a big punch i don't like the gun, the one exception is my 223, I like shooting it as well.
But my two main rifles for hunting is my 375RUM and my 358 Norma.
I have had a bunch of different Nito cals, a 72cal black powder, and still run a 54cal black. Not that any one of them has killed deer any better than the old 25-06 I just love shooting them.
I did at the range one day watch a guy, shooting a 338-378 Weatherby, and was cursing the scope(SB) and the gun, as he could not get it sighted in at all.
After watching him shoot for a bit, I noticed that he was closing his eyes just as he pulled the trigger, lol. But he must have been scared stiff. He was commenting how that stupid $4000 scope must need to be sent back for warranty. I tried to trade him straight across for my VX1 leupold that was tracking just fine, but he politely declined.
Everyone is different I guess, and handles recoil differently. To some a 30-06 is to much, to me I have not found one with too much yet. I shot about 450 rounds out of my 375RUM in the last couple months and still am loving it.
It is wise to know one's limitations, that doesn't make you smarter...just makes you aware that you don't like recoil, lol
It is wise to know one's limitations, that doesn't make you smarter...just makes you aware that you don't like recoil, lol
Any fool can be uncomfortable!




























