It's an LK M70 in 9.3x62mm.
Chamber issues or something else? Trigger can be a real challenge to set up.
It's an LK M70 in 9.3x62mm.
Chamber issues or something else? Trigger can be a real challenge to set up.
No, so far the machining on the bolt was sloppy so half the time I cycled the action the bolt would bind when sliding over the extractor. In some cases it would just stop dead. I ended up needing a small washer to reposition the extractor blade to slide through the groove in the lug better and polishing the face of the blade itself to remove a burr. The raceways are atrocious/10 in terms of finishing and will need hours upon hours of cycling to smooth out.
I adjusted the trigger from "complete sh!t" to "slightly less sh!t" while I had the gun on the bench and noticed a crack at the recoil lug so I ended up glassing it with epoxy and fiberglass tape. Reassembled the rifle and sure enough, the safety doesn't want to engage. Pull it back out, "click". Put it back in, clearly it's binding on something.
Lots of problems with Weaver bases, I tried Interarms and Mauser 98 bases and neither worked well, I tried a one-piece base and it didn't work either, and it wasn't until I managed to find a set of Leupold bases for the Mark X that seemed to fit without needing to shim too much. At least the holes look straight.
Rounds don't feed very well, I was using 286gr Norma Alaskan factory loads and they struggled to make it up the feed ramp without being slammed into place. Then I discovered the bolt had been assembled incorrectly, for one there was a burr near the firing pin opening, and two, the bolt sleeve wasn't threaded all the way in so there were no primer strikes.
Hoping for better results tomorrow as I'm bringing it to the range now that all this garbage is taken care of. If it still doesn't work, you will all hear about it!
Is there any truth to the statement that zastavas under the Remington and interarms banners are better finished than zastavas? I’ve seen some impressive looking interarms deluxe models with express sights barrel bands and very nice wood
Don’t worry boys, Granite Mountain in Phoenix Arizona has the solution to all of our problems. No price listed, I’m guessing we are in “ if you have to ask” category
They make some truly massive actions. Love the bolt handles on these, I like a straight handle but the extra long ones often seen on high end customs are not to my tastes
This setup on guns international may be a budget option compared to the GMA actions. Looks pretty slick, no doubt you are paying for the name
![]()
Only issues remaining - the stock is made for a giant. At 5'9" most off the shelf guns are basically made for me, but this thing is a stretch. Might need to see what Boyd's has.
Getting there!
Is the 601 close enough to a Mauser to fit in an aftermarket 98 stock?
There’s a cut down one at great north guns that has a pop up peep. Just needs a front sight and QD mounts to be a “scout rifle”. Pretty sure this build with an IER scope was one of Jeff Coopers originals mentioned in art of the rifle?
Still curious about removing/replacing claw mounts. Lots of cool rifles on the market right now with all the traits I desire but mounts with no matching rings. It’s my understanding they are fit by hand and $$$$?
Pretty modern mounting solution machined into a Satterlee titanium Mauser:
![]()
Guessing the time investment is why NECG is charging so much to fit a set?
I would call Jason at Gunco and ask. If anybody can do it, it's him. Ralf Martini also, but he's about 2 years behind in custom orders and is likely not taking on small projects.
For scope clearance, I would avoid butterknife handles if I were you. However, if you must, a cheaper and easier alternative would be to buy a used Brno 21 from Tradex, harvest the M98 butterknife bolt and part the rest out.
Good gunsmithing isn't cheap. - dan
Butterknife bolt handles were being added as a custom touch to factory rifles by gunsmiths in Canada before Jason was ever born and before Ralf ever set his hands on gunsmithing tools, much less immigrated to Canada. I know of at least three of them out there who are still doing it - two of whom are members here - and that's just in BC; nor am I particularly knowledgeable of the gunsmiths out there today. Also in BC, aside from the three gunsmiths I know of, Ralf's former partner Martin Hagn probably would do such a small job, as would Waffen Weber in the interior.
I would not expect this modification to a conventional bolt handle with a ball end should be difficult for a gunsmith who knows his business, nor should the work require so many hours as to make the cost objectionable. The rifles I have chosen to have this small custom modification on have been done at very reasonable cost.
It isn't hard to modify a ball end bolt handle to a butterknife handle, including having the outcome being both pleasing to the eye and the hand, as well as still fitting into the bolt handle cutout in the original stock.
This is an example of the first one I had done like this, sometime back around the end of the 1970's, on a Husqvarna Husky rifle - and those svelte actions are also a fine platform if your desires aren't restricted to something with 'Mauser" roll stamped on it.
I don't know why anyone wanting one should avoid them, unless perhaps they insisted that a butterknife style bolt handle must be of the original designs from the turn of the last century. Mannlicher Steyr is one example of a manufacturer making rifles with that style of bolt handle from at least the 1970s forward that is intended for a rifle that will have a scope mounted. A school/hunting buddy of mine bought one of their rifles in 30/06 back in the 1970's, and they are very fine rifles indeed.
![]()