I can't believe that this thread is still going.
I dare anyone to take 10 XCR's and 10 SAN's (Or 10 LMT's) to the range and run them hard. By hard I mean training with 30rd mags on semi, burst and full auto to a tune of 800 to 1000 rounds at day. In short, serious training with the guns getting hot.
The XCR's will fall apart. The SAN's, LMT's, 416's will keep running.
If you don't know this and want to keep posting about how great the XCR is you are uninformed and an amateur.
Rich
PS: I happen to like the XCR and think it's a cool gun. Just don't put it in the same league as these others...please.
I can't believe that this thread is still going.
I dare anyone to take 10 XCR's and 10 SAN's (Or 10 LMT's) to the range and run them hard. By hard I mean training with 30rd mags on semi, burst and full auto to a tune of 800 to 1000 rounds at day. In short, serious training with the guns getting hot.
The XCR's will fall apart. The SAN's, LMT's, 416's will keep running.
If you don't know this and want to keep posting about how great the XCR is you are uninformed and an amateur.
Rich
PS: I happen to like the XCR and think it's a cool gun. Just don't put it in the same league as these others...please.
I could give a flying monkeys ass about the other rifles mentioned. I gave you my experience with the XCR. I have only owned 2 AR's and tried 1 180B. I had my best experience of those with the XCR. With the new trigger coming out before Christmas,..I will not have much to complain about.I can't believe that this thread is still going.
I dare anyone to take 10 XCR's and 10 SAN's (Or 10 LMT's) to the range and run them hard. By hard I mean training with 30rd mags on semi, burst and full auto to a tune of 800 to 1000 rounds at day. In short, serious training with the guns getting hot.
The XCR's will fall apart. The SAN's, LMT's, 416's will keep running.
If you don't know this and want to keep posting about how great the XCR is you are uninformed and an amateur.
Rich
PS: I happen to like the XCR and think it's a cool gun. Just don't put it in the same league as these others...please.
I guess I am uninformed and amateur.I could give a flying monkeys ass about the other rifles mentioned. I gave you my experience with the XCR. I have only owned 2 AR's and tried 1 180B. I had my best experience of those with the XCR. With the new trigger coming out before Christmas,..I will not have much to complain about.
NO need to s**t on other people. I research all my purchases before I buy. The XCR is a decent rifle, and IN MY EXPERIENCE,..it worked great.

I can't believe that this thread is still going.
I dare anyone to take 10 XCR's and 10 SAN's (Or 10 LMT's) to the range and run them hard. By hard I mean training with 30rd mags on semi, burst and full auto to a tune of 800 to 1000 rounds at day. In short, serious training with the guns getting hot.
The XCR's will fall apart. The SAN's, LMT's, 416's will keep running.
If you don't know this and want to keep posting about how great the XCR is you are uninformed and an amateur.
Rich
PS: I happen to like the XCR and think it's a cool gun. Just don't put it in the same league as these others...please.
From Handgunsmag.com to illustrate:
Throughout history, technological advances in firearms were just as likely to be greeted with derision as with enthusiasm. Fans of the matchlock musket distrusted the flintlock, while a few dozen decades later partisans of muzzleloading scoffed at the new concept of metallic cartridges. Later everyone believed that repeating firearms were too complicated and likely to get out of order in the field. And those smallbore, jacketed bullets could not possibly stop a determined enemy soldier like a heavy, slow-moving lead projectile. Or how about police using semiauto pistols instead of revolvers? The very idea was too ridiculous to contemplate. Well, as history has proven, the above examples were not the first time the traditionalists among us were wrong, and they won't be the last.
I get the feeling that the nay sayers here are either attacking the XCR out of small minded fear of the new like above, or just have some personal grudge based on some aesthetic reason.
I think you're over the top in defending the XCR because in your heart-of-hearts you feel its a Rosie O'Donnell.
Do you think you're going to convince anybody of anything by ranting? How about letting it rest...Take the day off and go shoot.
I've still got an XCR on order and I think I will go ahead and purchase it, even after reading all of this, given RA is so willing to help their customers get back up and running.
My NIB SIG P229 broke (takedown lever) a few weeks back after a Black Badge class and I'm still waiting for replacement parts. I couldn't use it for my first competition and it's still sitting there useless. It's under warranty, and the best they can do is ship me a part and I'll pay to have it fixed by a local shop... or ship it via the Canadian Rep and wait half a year. QC at a "Swiss" company didn't buy me piece of mind and I paid more than 2x what Norinco's clone went for.
YMMV
Or maybe, just maybe, their opinions are based on experience, use, and failure of the system.I get the feeling that the nay sayers here are either attacking the XCR out of small minded fear of the new like above, or just have some personal grudge based on some aesthetic reason.
Or maybe, just maybe, their opinions are based on experience, use, and failure of the system.
I had an XCR, I wasn't impressed. I sold it too a friend, and we broke it the first time out.
so again, using technical explanations, what makes the sig better than the xcr??
Eg, I think the ar15 has some fundamental flaws, the first being DI. Piston system is cleaner and more reliable. Period. I prefer the short stroke piston system over the long stroke. (vz58>xcr,pe90,ak47 piston set up)
The ar shouldn't have a spring loaded ejector. Can s**t the bed too easily.
The ar bolt has 8 lugs. They are small, and weaker than other systems.
If those things were changed, I think the ar would be much more reliable




























