30-06 vs 308 ballistics and energy

Well, I am not sure what this has to do with this discussion, but it is an interesting bit of trivia. If you can cut down a .308 and make a .45 acp, then one should be able to cut down an 06 and do the same thing? When cut down, what one can do the other can do. I think that both were often used in the early day of the 44 auto mag?

you're right, as well as the 451 detonics, and a bunch of others all on the 06 head- - you just run the case through the appropriate trim die and cut the rest off with a hacksaw or as i prefer, a tubing cutter-
 
The 30-06 is a better hunting round. Nobody will go hunting moose with a .308 but many shooter still go with the 30-06 specially with the 180-200 grain bullet. You are lucky to get 2700 hundred feet of energy with the right handload combination in .308 but it is easy to get 3200 in the 30.06. This is a BIG difference. I own rifle in those two calibers and the 30-06 is as accurate as the .308. For hunting - 30-06 is the round to choose between the two.

nobody hunts moose with a .308? interesting...no wonder i don't come on here much anymore it's too frustrating to read the nonsense drivel.
 
Sierra does not recommend the Matchkings for hunting, nor does Hornady recommend their Amax bullets for hunting, but many of us long range shooters/hunters have found that they work very well.
I have killed many animals both here and in Africa using SMKs.
My doe last weekend was shot at 700 yards away, the shot was placed at the base of her skull, all I had left to cut was the wind pipe and a bit of skin to make her headless.
There is alot more on the use of match bullets on longrangehunting forum.


you tried a headshot at 700 yards? haha move over Tom Berenger!! and to be totally fair i know you have loads of experience but a shot placed at the base of a deers neck is not really a fair representation of a chest shot..penetration isn't an issue with the neck and most of us mortals cannot hope to make headshots routinely on animals at 300 yards let alone 700.
 
And hasn't it been conclusively demonstrated through over a century of documented cases of people bringing home dinner that the lower-powered .303 British is sufficient to kill everything that walks on this continent, not to mention Nazis, and some soft-skinned vehicles as well, although it's probably not quite enough gun for hunting garbage trucks?

Not to mention light bombers. The spitfires and hurricanes used that cartridge in their machine guns if i'm not mistaken.

My rule of thumb is if it's good enough to shoot down a heinkel, it's good enough to shoot down a moose :D
 
How about the .308 for most purposes and then use the Hornady LM .308 when you need that little bit extra, you know to turn it up to 11 because sometimes 10 just isn't enough??

Seriously though, Gwyneth Paltrow wins hands down.
 
you tried a headshot at 700 yards? haha move over Tom Berenger!! and to be totally fair i know you have loads of experience but a shot placed at the base of a deers neck is not really a fair representation of a chest shot..penetration isn't an issue with the neck and most of us mortals cannot hope to make headshots routinely on animals at 300 yards let alone 700.

I did not TRY a head shot, I deliberately shot at the neck at the base of the skull and was successful. Lets think about that for a second. A 8" target at 700 yards is more than 1 moa, I really don't think shooting 1 moa is all that big a deal.
Last year my son shot his deer at 600 yards with a SMK in the chest, the bullet still blew through and made the deer dead on the spot.
The 30 plus donkeys I shot in Africa , all with SMKs all dies on the spot, even the sparrow I head shot at 600 yards died on the spot:D
IMG_2530-1.jpg
 
Get your number right : The .308 will get that 165 grain at 2800 ( max speed I found in the Sierra reloading manual ) - for 2875 foot pound of energy - the same bullet in the 30-06 will get it at 2900 + for close to 3100 foot pounds of energy. Yes you can kill a bear or a moose with bow and arrow. I guided in an outfitting business for years and chased wounded moose and bear more than once because of the not so perfect shot with not enough gun.

If you implying the same shot out of a 308 will not down the same game animalas the 06 your just so full of bunk!

I stand behind what I wrote : the 30-06 is a better hunting round - period.

Yes it's such a huge improvement...2800fps versus 2900fps :rolleyes:
 
I did not TRY a head shot, I deliberately shot at the neck at the base of the skull and was successful. Lets think about that for a second. A 8" target at 700 yards is more than 1 moa, I really don't think shooting 1 moa is all that big a deal.

The 30 plus donkeys I shot in Africa , all with SMKs all dies on the spot, even the sparrow I head shot at 600 yards died on the spot:D

I don't think you can compare 1 moa at 100 to 8" at 700yds!
There's a little more involved like bullet drop & windage judgment!

If you can head shoot a sparrow reliably at 600yds I'd suggest we have a new world champion on our board here boys :cool:
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janeau View Post
The 30-06 is a better hunting round. Nobody will go hunting moose with a .308 but many shooter still go with the 30-06 specially with the 180-200 grain bullet. You are lucky to get 2700 hundred feet of energy with the right handload combination in .308 but it is easy to get 3200 in the 30.06. This is a BIG difference. I own rifle in those two calibers and the 30-06 is as accurate as the .308. For hunting - 30-06 is the round to choose between the two.


HUH???
3200FPS with a 200 gr bullet out of an 06? please pass the shovel.:rolleyes:

Actually I was gonna suggest a backhoe :p
3200FPS with a 180 would require the shovel ;)
 
I don't think you can compare 1 moa at 100 to 8" at 700yds!
There's a little more involved like bullet drop & windage judgment!

1 moa IS 7" at 700 yards.
To consistently shoot groups of 3 or more shots into under 1 moa at any range takes alot of trigger time, and your are ABSOLUTELY correct, there is ALOT more involved. Wind being the hardest to dope, but 1 also has to take into account, temperature, humidity, altitude and so on.
I spend a great deal on my time shooting well beyond 1000 yards, so feel a 700 yard shot is not a real big deal, especially with the equipment I have to use. My rifles are all capable of far better than 1/2 moa groupings, not many people hunt with a custom target rifle as I do however.
 
The 30-06 is a better hunting round. Nobody will go hunting moose with a .308 but many shooter still go with the 30-06 specially with the 180-200 grain bullet.

Wow! That's about the most blatantly incorrect thing I have seen here on Gunnutz. That's really saying something, too!

Really.

:slap:

Cheers
Trev
 
Not to mention light bombers. The spitfires and hurricanes used that cartridge in their machine guns if i'm not mistaken.

My rule of thumb is if it's good enough to shoot down a heinkel, it's good enough to shoot down a moose :D

Well said. :D
 
Not to mention light bombers. The spitfires and hurricanes used that cartridge in their machine guns if i'm not mistaken.

My rule of thumb is if it's good enough to shoot down a heinkel, it's good enough to shoot down a moose :D

Both the Hurricanes and the Spitfires were fitted with eight wing-mounted 0.303-inch (7.7mmx56R) machine guns.

But, please, let's not mix hunting with dog-fighting. There's no comparison.
 
Last edited:
1 moa IS 7" at 700 yards.
To consistently shoot groups of 3 or more shots into under 1 moa at any range takes alot of trigger time, and your are ABSOLUTELY correct, there is ALOT more involved. Wind being the hardest to dope, but 1 also has to take into account, temperature, humidity, altitude and so on.
I spend a great deal on my time shooting well beyond 1000 yards, so feel a 700 yard shot is not a real big deal, especially with the equipment I have to use. My rifles are all capable of far better than 1/2 moa groupings, not many people hunt with a custom target rifle as I do however.

Thats kool, so how accurate does your rifle need to be for a sparrows head at 600yds??
That's about 1/2" div by 6 for 600yds = about .08 of an inch at 100yds :eek:
Not counting the other minor factors you described!
So just how good are you ;)
 
Last edited:
He's my Winchester pre'64 fwt .308 Win performance:

150gr Sierra
2866 fps

caution this load is maximum but shoots 3 shots bench rest @ 100 yds .246"

watermark.php

Oh No! It does not matter how fast it is or how accurate it is, everyone should know that the .308 is not enough gun:rolleyes:
 
Thats kool, so how accurate does your rifle need to be for a sparrows head at 600yds??
That's about 1/2" div by 600 = about .08 of an inch at 100yds :eek:
Not counting the other minor factors you described!
So just how good are you ;)



Just to be clear here that shot WAS called and witnessed, not just a fluke.

These are Guinea hens shot on the wing in South Africa last June.
323.jpg


322.jpg


Note just the heads have some damage. The PH figured 300 win mag may have been a tad overkill for chicken sized birds.

The 338LAI I shot that sparrow with is now owned by "Kevan" on CGN. Lets just say it is not hard to keep putting bullets in the same hole at 100 yards with that rifle.
The 1 I built to replace that particular rifle is not quite as accurate, it makes a slightly ragged hole at 100 yards.
Keeping shots all inside 1/2 moa with either rifle is no chore.
As soon as I get my own actions built I will be replacing the current 338LAI with another 1.


Ad Topperwein was asked that question as well in the early 1900s
"Just how good are you?"
"I have good days in which I can do magic with a rifle, and I have days in which I should haved stayed in bed." Was his answer

50 plus years of shooting practice and being taught be the best does tend to give 1 an advantage just like any other sport where the participant started very young and kept at it through out his life.

I like Ad's answer to the question.:cool:
 
But, please, let's not mix hunting with dog-fighting. There's no comparison.

True, the moose aren't made of metal and they don't shoot back :D

Point being, it's obviously not a 'wimpy' cartridge.
 
Just to be clear here that shot WAS called and witnessed, not just a fluke.

These are Guinea hens shot on the wing in South Africa last June.
323.jpg


322.jpg


Note just the heads have some damage. The PH figured 300 win mag may have been a tad overkill for chicken sized birds.

The 338LAI I shot that sparrow with is now owned by "Kevan" on CGN. Lets just say it is not hard to keep putting bullets in the same hole at 100 yards with that rifle.
The 1 I built to replace that particular rifle is not quite as accurate, it makes a slightly ragged hole at 100 yards.
Keeping shots all inside 1/2 moa with either rifle is no chore.
As soon as I get my own actions built I will be replacing the current 338LAI with another 1.


Ad Topperwein was asked that question as well in the early 1900s
"Just how good are you?"
"I have good days in which I can do magic with a rifle, and I have days in which I should haved stayed in bed." Was his answer

50 plus years of shooting practice and being taught be the best does tend to give 1 an advantage just like any other sport where the participant started very young and kept at it through out his life.

I like Ad's answer to the question.:cool:

When are the actions expected Rick? I was planning on bugging you in the new year.
 
Back
Top Bottom