And literally everyone (including us gun plumbers) removes them from C7s and C8s (at least in Valcartier).
If you guys are talking about CF C8s, we never had C8A2s. They were never bought and were never in the system - ever. They are different rifles with different barrels. We've had the C8FTHBs (with the black furniture and no ambidextrous controls) and C8A3s (with the green furniture and the ambidextrous controls of the C7A2).
And yup the top rails on the receivers of the CF rifles sit higher than regular AR-15 top rails. I think this is also true for H&K 416s. This is why A.R.M.S. makes a flip-up rear sight especially for C7s and C8s. If you bought a commercial flip-up rear sight you'd find out that they sit higher than the front sight. From what I saw, judging by pictures only, the rails on the civilian models are the standard AR-15 height and should be fine.
Has anyone made a range report for theirs yet?
Im well aware lol. So im not sure why a company like colt would put one into a $2200 ar15 unless they are trying to hide a very loose upper/lower fit.
Question 1: can you leave the front and rear iron sights on the civilian version when a scope is added? In other words, can I have both sighting systems installed at the same time on the firearm? It would make sense to me to have both in case the scope no longer works and you can use the iron sights as a backup system.
Man our M203 is a monstrosity.
I had both my SA20 and SA15.7 out to the 300 meter Swiss range this past weekend. Iron sights on the rifle and ELCAN on the 15.7. Shooting Swiss GP90 (62 Gr.) and M855, both shot exceptionally well. We spent more time shooting the 15.7 and it placed 99% rounds inside 10 ring of a Swiss military target at 300 meters (10 cm circle) using service ammo. The SA20 placed about 95% of the rounds into the same target with iron sights. They seem to be extremely accurate for an off-the-shelf service type rifle/carbine.
A back up system in case you're fighting Russians? (there, I said it!)
Unable to answer the question, so just another smart-ass troll who thinks he is funny but isn't!
Wow, impressed you got both and thanks for the side by side comparison!
I wasn't making fun of you for all the training you did back in the day to fight the Russians, rather pointing out "fighting the Russians" has come full circle and something that's on the plate again.
If you have a scope on your rifle then the front sight will be visible in your field of view but you can still shoot with it there. The rear sight will need to be a fancy flip up sight. If you had a non-flip up rear sight and scope you'd probably have too much #### on the go to see.
I wasn't making fun of you for all the training you did back in the day to fight the Russians, rather pointing out "fighting the Russians" has come full circle and something that's on the plate again.
If you have a scope on your rifle then the front sight will be visible in your field of view but you can still shoot with it there. The rear sight will need to be a fancy flip up sight. If you had a non-flip up rear sight and scope you'd probably have too much #### on the go to see.
We at the club were impressed with the accuracy of both, especially considering both use standard triggers.
As for upper/lower fit that others are asking about, they seem to be on par with Daniel Defense, Colts, LMT's I own.
Can someone answer the question: Can a 4x scope be mounted as well as the front gas port sight post? Or does the front sight post get in the view of the 4x scope and we have to remove the front sight post and put a low profile gas block instead?



























