Was going to put this pic in the hunting section but after the comments had to throw it up here ,the 1883 Dougall with its first pheasant under my watch.I will say it was not the first one that I shot at but it is the first confirmed one. cheers RD![]()
Time to bump this thread. Another wayward child comes home - a nicely restored Westley Richards percussion 16 gauge side by side. Lightly frosted bores (in proof!), no pitting, no dents, rebrowned barrels, properly recheckered stocks, wood refinished, original ebony ramrod, new nipples and crisp locks - grouse season isn’t over yet! I haven’t been able to date this yet, WR records are spread through many books and they usually used several books concurrently for different types or classes of guns or rifles. I’ve had two guns so far that they couldn’t trace so their records, although massive, aren’t complete. I’m guessing 1830 - 1860 but it could easily be older or newer. So, a nice usable high quality muzzle loading double by a renowned maker, but it’s screaming ( genteelly) for a suitable case. Any assistance here would be greatly appreciated.
Was going to put this pic in the hunting section but after the comments had to throw it up here ,the 1883 Dougall with its first pheasant under my watch.I will say it was not the first one that I shot at but it is the first confirmed one. cheers RD![]()
Thought Jim's Westley Richards he showed a few posts back looked lonely so here's another I picked up. Checking on WR's website, the gun was made 1834-1844. I communicated with Jim on this gun and we both feel, because of the cheekpiece and rifle style trigger guard, that it was likely a custom order by a European rifleman. I will be sending for the information that Westley Richard's has in their ledger. The gun sports 30" barrels and I believe is around 18 gauge. With the barrels removed there is a small piece of wood missing near the breech where the wood is thin where it covers the lock plate. An easy fix. The bores do have some fine pitting but nothing that renders it unusable. Both locks hold at half and full #### and function beautifully. Overall, not bad for around 182 years old.
View attachment 635899
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()