Picture of the day

Big 'ol birds. There was at least one in the storage hangers at Trenton/Mountainview when I took my Cadet's glider course in the 80's. Also CF-100 Canucks, T-33's, CF-104's and CF-5's.

Don't think we were allowed access to those areas but we certainly wandered around and checked them out.

There was even and old Sabre sitting outside between the huts; pretty sure that was at Picton. We would sit around it taking classes when the huts were too hot. Wish I had taken photos.
 
Remember that.
Saw a few CT-114 as well. The whole jet was covered with a thin rubber coating.
I know we weren't allowed in the hangers... cuz we got 'Royal Sh!t' for being in "Unauthorized Area"
 
*Cries in Canada used to have the 2nd largest Navy post WW2 and an operational carrier battle fleet even years well after that*

You can probably feel the dripping sarcasm but wouldn’t it be very damn nice to still have a carrier battle group with the recent rise of Russian AND US aggression…? The beauty of such battle groups is they project a ####load of sovereignty well beyond what a humble destroyer can do. The potential enemy does not technically even need to detect the screening subs or main carrier force to know that they may really not be safe. AKA carrier battle groups and lots of advanced stealthy subs promote priceless “passive” deterrence.
 
M K ; I am certain I could not begin to fathom the relief your grandparents must have felt when they were released; along with their other relatives when they found out the news. Rick
 
Man, quite the collection: P-38s, a P-61 or two (left side middle) C47s, A20s... The scrap guys must have done well. Damn shame no one thought to put aside one of each for later.

The ol' A20 was popular. They got around.

USA_Douglas_A20_s1.jpg


a20g-11.jpg


ava20_13.jpg


It even came in an off-road edition:

GAN8-A-20TrackGear-flt.jpg
 
Huh. Looks like the OT has sprung a leak.

I know it's a long, long way back - 25K posts or so - but maybe read the first post in this thread before you take time out of your day to post this sh!t? This thread's been running a long time now. It's never been removed because it does what it says - daily posts of interesting military stuff. Please delete your post before a mod wanders in here, says "nope", and whacks several years of more interesting material.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hungarian tanks - who knew Hungary had its own tank production during WW2?

images


images


1200px-40-43M_Zr%C3%ADnyi_II_-_Hungarian_Assault_gun_%2823946901978%29.jpg


%D1%822.jpg


Pretty impressive for a minor nation.
 
Okay, but it's Saturday... not Friday... just say'n.

f-4-preparing-for-flight-on-uss-midway.jpg
The Flight Deck Director signals an F-4 Phantom II fighter into position on the starboard catapult aboard the U.S.S. Midway (CVA-41) in August 1970. Image: PH2 Kevin J. Freedman/U.S. Navy
 
*Cries in Canada used to have the 2nd largest Navy post WW2 and an operational carrier battle fleet even years well after that*

You can probably feel the dripping sarcasm but wouldn’t it be very damn nice to still have a carrier battle group with the recent rise of Russian AND US aggression…? The beauty of such battle groups is they project a ####load of sovereignty well beyond what a humble destroyer can do. The potential enemy does not technically even need to detect the screening subs or main carrier force to know that they may really not be safe. AKA carrier battle groups and lots of advanced stealthy subs promote priceless “passive” deterrence.
Screw that, can we get an efficient and effective sub fleet? Carriers are just targets considering we can barely staff/pilot the current F-18 fleet (I use fleet lightly)
Came back to edit that "we" should use the fighter plane money to buy as many AT Skywardens as possible as really the primary mission of the F-18s (and previous) has been ground attack.
 
Last edited:
*Cries in Canada used to have the 2nd largest Navy post WW2 and an operational carrier battle fleet even years well after that*

You can probably feel the dripping sarcasm but wouldn’t it be very damn nice to still have a carrier battle group with the recent rise of Russian AND US aggression…? The beauty of such battle groups is they project a ####load of sovereignty well beyond what a humble destroyer can do. The potential enemy does not technically even need to detect the screening subs or main carrier force to know that they may really not be safe. AKA carrier battle groups and lots of advanced stealthy subs promote priceless “passive” deterrence.
I would love to see our shipyards on both sides of the country booming with work building our country back up. Defence spending in this way puts Canadians to work and keeps tax dollars in our country while addressing our NATO requirements that the Libtards have dramatically failed to do and would go a long way to addressing U.S. concerns that are effecting our tariffs with them. Cheers
 
The "Century Series" jets are favourites of mine. They look like hood ornaments, all speedy intention and purpose.

The F-102 had a precursor with German DNA - the Convair XF-92A. Looks like a lawn dart, performed in a similar fashion.

avf102_02.jpg


XF-92A_Edwards_AFB.jpg


USAF_XF-92A.jpg


558485a70efba093d7247166442b5546.jpg


"Needs more vertical stabilizer..."

During World War II, German aircraft designers had investigated a number of advanced aircraft concepts. One notion, which had been investigated in detail by Dr. Alexander Lippisch, had been tailless aircraft; his work led to the Messerschmitt Me 163 rocket fighter. Although rocket fighters would prove to be a bad idea, aerodynamically the swept-wing Me 163 was ahead of its time. Lippisch went further, working on delta-winged tailless aircraft, in particular coming up with the "P13A" -- a design for a supersonic delta-winged aircraft, powered by a ramjet engine.

The P13A was never built; work was proceeding on an aerodynamic test glider, the "DM1", when Germany surrendered in May 1945. The Americans brought Lippisch and the DM1 to the US, where wind tunnel tests were conducted on the glider, with major changes in configuration to evaluate different concepts.

The Convair company was very interested in Lippisch's delta-wing concepts and came up with a concept for a delta-winged interceptor, designated the "XP-92". It originally was to be a "flying stovepipe" using rocket / ramjet propulsion, with a cylindrical body, delta wings and tailfin, and the cockpit in the engine inlet centerbody. It was an implausible-looking contraption, later being compared to a prop from a "Flash Gordon" movie serial. Since the design was so radical, actual flight experience with delta winged aircraft being very limited, Convair decided to build a fast-track demonstrator, originally designated the "Model 7002", to flight-test the concept.

The Model 7002 was put together cheaply, using existing components when possible -- for example, nose gear from a Bell P-63 Kingcobra, landing gear from a North American FJ-1 Fury. The Model 7002 was powered by a single Allison J33-A-23 non-afterburning centrifugal-flow turbojet with 23.1 kN (2,360 kgp / 5,200 lbf) thrust, fed by a circular inlet in the nose, and had delta wings with a 60 degree sweepback; a triangular tailfin; tricycle landing gear, with the nosewheel retracting forward and the main gear hinging from the fuselage into the wings; plus a framed clamshell canopy. It had no combat kit, and no combat capability.

The Air Force gave the Model 7002 the service designation of "XF-92A". The first flight of the XF-92A, in natural metal finish, was on 8 June 1948, from what was then Muroc Dry Lake in California and with company test pilot Sam Shannon at the controls. After initial trials, the aircraft was refitted with an afterburning J33-A-29 turbojet, providing 33.4 kN (3,400 kgp / 7,500 lbf) thrust, with the new engine fit involving a fuselage stretch. The XF-92A was painted white and continued its sequence of flight tests at Edwards Air Force Base (AFB), as Muroc had been renamed in the meantime.

The XF-92A was something of a disappointment, being both unreliable and performing well below expectations, which were admittedly inflated. It proved very useful, however, in correcting misperceptions and providing extensive data on the flight characteristics of delta-winged aircraft. After Air Force evaluation, the XF-92A was then handed over to the US National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA, the predecessor of the US National Aeronautics & Space Administration or NASA) for further flight tests into 1953.
 
Back
Top Bottom