Possible T81 New Issue

I thought the last 300 were all put into Kodiak receivers by Kodiak defense, or at least the majority of them...as some wood sets were bought separately from the metal bits...so in a round about way, they were supplied receivers...those of us who bought them as parts kits were just lucky enough to get in on the action...they did mention that no more Czech surplus parts would be coming in...

To my understanding there was only 300 total in the last batch all prohib as we know. Some were decommissioned and some were made into parts kits. I did ask in a email the difference between decommissioned and destroyed I got no answer to that.

I don't know how far they got into this procedure until the Kodiak receivers were made.

My receiver was cut up. The People with those had to mail them back to Manitoba. Not all did so only Wolverine could say for sure how many of the 300 became rifles that is if they even kept tabs which they're not required so maybe they don't even know. It's a little slice of history that's for sure.

One I hope never happens again
 
And you get that how?

I've said in other posts, I think they were $400-500 landed cost for TI. I paid $1000 knowing that and am fine with it, assuming my rifle won't be bent. We shall see.

HAHA, if you think TI paid anywhere close to $400 per unit then you are more foolish than I thought. I doubt TI paid more than $150 a unit. From the gong show and failures involved thus far I wouldn't pay more than $15 a unit. Ever stop to think why their "broken rifle" restocking/return fee is 20%, I'm betting that covers the cost of the rifle and shipping. TI can't lose!! Oh yeah, they financed this entire circus with consumer dollars to boot.

I'm enjoying the laughs with all the problems and issues but I honestly feel sorry for you guys. You expected a functioning rifle(not a top end rifle which is fine) and they delivered these half a$$ed ghetto built abortions. I commend those of you who waited several years to get yours but it clearly was a waste of time and money.... Which some of us tried to warn against. I especially find it entertaining that some here believe that the handful of "working/unbent" rifles will somehow increase in value as collectibles.... HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. No one desires a poorly designed and even poorer built rifle that cannot be supported.
 
^^^^^^People purchase and wait for what they like....look at any product including firearms you have purchased in your life time some stuff works some stuff doesn't some stuff you remain happy with if you like it....the wait time was rediculious I'll give you that...iam more than happy with the product i received....with how bad this order was it could even in be in the ball park of half of the entire order will be returned and who knows sent for scrap or sold as parts rifles.....do you really think anyone is going to risk brining in another order of these with all the problems we have encountered......that leaves roughly 500 rifles available in the Canadian market...and possibly no more forever.....therefore the price goes up....the pre order didn't sell out for no reason.....remember when those cz858s sold for 2 grand on EE ?and there must of been 20,000 floating around.......if they can guarantee a flawless T81 folder I'll buy one of those to match my fixed anytime
 
Last edited:
You would to think wouldn't ya!?!?!?!?

Not too mention I had a seperate order for myself that seemed to have been forgotten so I ended up canceling that about a week or so ago with no refund yet!?!?!?!

I have only seen one T-81 in person, but if I may, I would suggest cancelling your order. They are complete junk. If you are at all fussy about quality over LCF, you will not be happy. VZ/CZ are miles ahead in quality and even SKS looks better. Thats my opinion. I wouldn't own one at any price.
 
I have only seen one T-81 in person, but if I may, I would suggest cancelling your order. They are complete junk. If you are at all fussy about quality over LCF, you will not be happy. VZ/CZ are miles ahead in quality and even SKS looks better. Thats my opinion. I wouldn't own one at any price.

I agree, but you could say it in a nicer way, think of all the hurt feelings.
 
^^^^^^People purchase and wait for what they like....look at any product including firearms you have purchased in your life time some stuff works some stuff doesn't some stuff you remain happy with if you like it....the wait time was rediculious I'll give you that...iam more than happy with the product i received....with how bad this order was it could even in be in the ball park of half of the entire order will be returned and who knows sent for scrap or sold as parts rifles.....do you really think anyone is going to risk brining in another order of these with all the problems we have encountered......that leaves roughly 500 rifles available in the Canadian market...and possibly no more forever.....therefore the price goes up....the pre order didn't sell out for no reason.....remember when those cz858s sold for 2 grand on EE ?and there must of been 20,000 floating around.......if they can guarantee a flawless T81 folder I'll buy one of those to match my fixed anytime

Wow, the poor spelling, grammar and punctuation makes your post unbearable to decipher. Nevertheless I have managed to figure it out.

Selling out a pre order(as indicated by TI, not a verified fact) is hardly an indicator of quality. It simply indicates that a fool and his money are soon parted. Like most products available today they are absolute garbage and suck people in by the boat load. Have a look at the "As seen on TV" stores in the mall, almost entirely gimmicks. In the shooting community alone we've had the Type 81, Type 97, Rhineland Arms, NEA rifles, That weird Ak bolt action gong show, The M1 Garands that were garage built, the list goes on.

The belief that scarcity somehow equates to increased value is a pipe dream. You must have demand coupled with a slim supply for prices to climb. There is no demand for these rifles outside the initial investors who paid up front. No demand, no value regardless of supply. Your anecdotal example of people grossly over paying for 858's is nothing but proof that a fool and his money are soon parted. The 858's are excellent rifles but they are not worth $2000.

I'm not sure Norinco can guarantee the sun will come up tomorrow let alone a "flawless" rifle of any design. Do we know if Norinco has blueprints for the Type 81or if they have standards of any sort?? Lets not kid ourselves as this isn't the first Norinco product to show signs of poor quality and craftsmanship accompanied by an endless list of problems.. See a trend???
 
Here you go Eden

IMG_0070.jpg


Mine looks exactly the same, put 200rnds though it today and it never hesitated even once. It also never stoped me from hitting 12” plates at 110m. My stock is also a little twisted but that just made me have to adjust my grip slightly. I say shoot em, they are a pleasure to shoot.
 
yeah well I'm sending my piece of s#*t back. I was a TI type 81 ball rider but have soured now and all you straight rifle guys that say oh just shoot your bent rifle be happy and your standards are to high well is it really so much to ask that I get a f#*king rifle that looks straight to the naked eye overall (not talkin about the furniture) for 1000$ is it really so high of standers Really guys REALLY!!!
 
yeah well I'm sending my piece of s#*t back. I was a TI type 81 ball rider but have soured now and all you straight rifle guys that say oh just shoot your bent rifle be happy and your standards are to high well is it really so much to ask that I get a f#*king rifle that looks straight to the naked eye overall (not talkin about the furniture) for 1000$ is it really so high of standers Really guys REALLY!!!

You should get m10x DMR. That one shoots 4 MOA guaranteed with premium ammo.
 
I don't know what some of you non T81 owners are getting so worked up about.

I wanted an AK47 looking Chi-Com Bullet hose, and that's what I got. In that regard, it's top notch.

Everyone knew (or should have known) that the price tag of $1000 is just what it cost us. The price tag has zero bearing on the quality of the rifle.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry to say that Mustang Frank and Kidd X have nailed it. They may be lacking in tact, but they are not wrong concerning the disappointing quality and low future resale value of the T81s. Quite frankly, I wouldn't pay more than $400 for a straight one, and that is only if I were interested in acquiring one, which I am definitely not. Although I collect modern, Post-WW2 military-style firearms, I have zero interest in the T81. They are nothing more than an odd and unfortunate footnote in military firearms history, used by a virtual "who's who" of destitute 3rd-World militaries. Then there is the famous Norinco-plinko "quality" to consider, with custom, dremel-fitted critical components, razor-sharp edges, softwood furniture, rust-prone salt bluing, etc, etc. No thank-you. There is nothing even remotely "collector grade" about these firearms and those who think there is are sadly delusional.
 
I'm sorry to say that Mustang Frank and Kidd X have nailed it. They may be lacking in tact, but they are not wrong concerning the disappointing quality and low future resale value of the T81s. Quite frankly, I wouldn't pay more than $400 for a straight one, and that is only if I were interested in acquiring one, which I am definitely not. Although I collect modern, Post-WW2 military-style firearms, I have zero interest in the T81. They are nothing more than an odd and unfortunate footnote in military firearms history, used by a virtual "who's who" of destitute 3rd-World militaries. Then there is the famous Norinco-plinko "quality" to consider, with custom, dremel-fitted critical components, razor-sharp edges, softwood furniture, rust-prone salt bluing, etc, etc. No thank-you. There is nothing even remotely "collector grade" about these firearms and those who think there is are sadly delusional.

"Collector grade???"

When was "Collector Grade" advertised???

They are AK47 look alike fun guns.

A few guys are bringing out lasers and having a panic. The lasers and the panic are only important if you are prone to panic and you don't understand what you were buying. I'm sure a small few are truly defective, but the bent gun freak out is likely unwarranted .

The T81 are what they are! Go blast away and have fun! If you wanted a sub MOA rifle, you made the wrong choice :)
 
You should get m10x DMR. That one shoots 4 MOA guaranteed with premium ammo.
ohhhh oh no that m10x dmr is awesome and I was completely unaware of this thing do you know what you have done now I have to have that piece of s#*t and do this all over again cuz I'm an idiot and I never learn THANKS BLACKVOID!!!
 
I'm sorry to say that Mustang Frank and Kidd X have nailed it. They may be lacking in tact, but they are not wrong concerning the disappointing quality and low future resale value of the T81s. Quite frankly, I wouldn't pay more than $400 for a straight one, and that is only if I were interested in acquiring one, which I am definitely not. Although I collect modern, Post-WW2 military-style firearms, I have zero interest in the T81. They are nothing more than an odd and unfortunate footnote in military firearms history, used by a virtual "who's who" of destitute 3rd-World militaries. Then there is the famous Norinco-plinko "quality" to consider, with custom, dremel-fitted critical components, razor-sharp edges, softwood furniture, rust-prone salt bluing, etc, etc. No thank-you. There is nothing even remotely "collector grade" about these firearms and those who think there is are sadly delusional.

This is the first time I read a thread concerning T81's... as I had zero interest in them and I know hype when I see it. This reinforces that sentiment. Quite happy with my all-matching Russian SKS workhorses that deliver similar accuracy in a far more reliable and rugged platform.
 
ohhhh oh no that m10x dmr is awesome and I was completely unaware of this thing do you know what you have done now I have to have that piece of s#*t and do this all over again cuz I'm an idiot and I never learn THANKS BLACKVOID!!!

Oh, you better not look to see how much those sell for in the US before buying one here or you'll have a sh!tfit seeing how much we're getting arse-raped here to have a DMR safety and an extra inch and a half of barrel.
Looks like a good rifle but the CEO of the company is a douchbag and the price is too high (in my opinion) for a rifle like that. People whine that TI probably only paid $200 per unit and sells them for $1000, I would bet M+M only has $500 into each rifle before adding the F Canadians tax and the import costs.

Wow, the poor spelling, grammar and punctuation makes your post unbearable to decipher. Nevertheless I have managed to figure it out.

Selling out a pre order(as indicated by TI, not a verified fact) is hardly an indicator of quality. It simply indicates that a fool and his money are soon parted. Like most products available today they are absolute garbage and suck people in by the boat load. Have a look at the "As seen on TV" stores in the mall, almost entirely gimmicks. In the shooting community alone we've had the Type 81, Type 97, Rhineland Arms, NEA rifles, That weird Ak bolt action gong show, The M1 Garands that were garage built, the list goes on.

The belief that scarcity somehow equates to increased value is a pipe dream. You must have demand coupled with a slim supply for prices to climb. There is no demand for these rifles outside the initial investors who paid up front. No demand, no value regardless of supply. Your anecdotal example of people grossly over paying for 858's is nothing but proof that a fool and his money are soon parted. The 858's are excellent rifles but they are not worth $2000.

I'm not sure Norinco can guarantee the sun will come up tomorrow let alone a "flawless" rifle of any design. Do we know if Norinco has blueprints for the Type 81or if they have standards of any sort?? Lets not kid ourselves as this isn't the first Norinco product to show signs of poor quality and craftsmanship accompanied by an endless list of problems.. See a trend???

I can argue none of this, my only comment is to add to it.
Have none of you ever bought a Norinco or Poly rifle before? What the hell were you expecting? Anyone with any sense does not buy a rifle made in China and expect it to be flawless or even high quality. These are cheap, reliable bullet hoses and a slightly "bent" receiver will not change that. These are probably the exact same quality as the ones issued to PLA soldiers but they just took them into battle rather than trying to find fault with them. I'm glad TI has a restocking fee because from the pics I've seen most of the rifles people are nit-picking and sending back with tears rolling down their butt-hurt cheeks are perfectly functional and are only flawed if you expect them to rival North American made rifles.

Will these rise in "value" or "cost"? I doubt that very much, these are collector nothing and I predict they will settle in at around $700 on the EE or if another batch is imported. They COST $1000 because of all the guys who jumped on the pre-order early, just like every other rifle out there like the 102, the M10x, APC, etc, if you jump on and just throw your money at the first price they give out you will pay top dollar. If you guys had shown interest but said the price was too high they would have tried again with a lower price. This can be repeated until the importer reaches a price they feel no longer covers their margin and it is no longer worth their time or effort. Have none of you ever negotiated a price before?

Why do you think the Pre-Order has become so popular the last couple years? Because it's a great way for a retailer/importer to get maximum profits, they don't do it for us, it's all about making the most money possible. If you think the pre-order financed the buy you don't know shat, they can always take out a loan to finance it, that's what banks do for businesses who need money to make money.

Being mad at TI for charging $1000 for these is just stupid, no one forced you to buy one, you all volunteered to pay $1000 for a rifle made in China from a company we've all seen products from. Every Norc 1911 I've owned has needed a file to smooth out the sharp edges and every M305/M14 I've owned has needed a little fitting to get things lined up correctly. Why would anyone expect anything different with the Type-81?
Guys seem to think $1000 is a lot of money for a semi auto, well wake up people, look around. What else can you buy for $1000? A T-97, or a Kel-Tec, and everyone complains about those.

Put away your lasers and micrometers and just go shoot your rifle, they're very smooth shooting and are a lot of fun. Sitting around crying that it's not perfect is just silly, these are a splitting axe not a scalpel, treat them as such and you'll be much happier.

Or a BCL 102 and save a few hundred

LMFAO! I would bet that buying an NEA/BCL would give you even less chance of getting a perfect rifle than buying Norinco/Poly, the only difference is that NEA/BCL has a warranty.
 
Last edited:
People whine that TI probably only paid $200 per unit and sells them for $1000, I would bet M+M only has $500 into each rifle before adding the F Canadians tax and the import costs.

So, Tactical Imports and Norinco are charging a 500% premium on the T81, but it is OK for their customers to rationalize away the fact that they are getting ripped off because they know that they are getting shafted. As if knowing that you are getting ripped-off somehow makes it all OK!?!?

By your math, North Sylva and M&M Industries are charging a 400% mark-up for the M10X. Even taking into account the distinct likelihood that your numbers are hugely inflated (1st-world production costs versus Dremel grinders for the Norinco monkeys), that means NS and M+M are charging less of a mark-up on the M10X than TI and Norinco did for the T81. Yet by your argument, we are supposed to be outraged about the Canadian price of the M10X?? Your argument is fundamentally flawed....
 
So, Tactical Imports and Norinco are charging a 500% premium on the T81, but it is OK for their customers to rationalize away the fact that they are getting ripped off because they know that they are getting shafted. As if knowing that you are getting ripped-off somehow makes it all OK!?!?

By your math, North Sylva and M&M Industries are charging a 400% mark-up for the M10X. Even taking into account the distinct likelihood that your numbers are hugely inflated (1st-world production costs versus Dremel grinders for the Norinco monkeys), that means NS and M+M are charging less of a mark-up on the M10X than TI and Norinco did for the T81. Yet by your argument, we are supposed to be outraged about the Canadian price of the M10X?? Your argument is fundamentally flawed....

The prices I threw out were just random guesses, if it makes you feel better I'll say BCL probably only has $500 into each 102 yet they retail for $1750. I'm just saying that all companies mark up prices and it's stupid to be mad at them for trying to make a profit. We can control prices but we need to show restraint to do it. Like I said with the T-81, if everyone had said "nice rifle, but too much money" TI would have lowered the price and tried again a week later with some BS "we were able to negotiate a better price" story. Same for the M10x, they see we're desperate for a decent non restricted and throw out a high price, people throw their money down on a pre-order and the price is set. If everyone had said no when they jacked the price $500 the price would have come back down to around $1700-$1800. If people continued to say no at that price they would try again until people started paying or it's no longer profitable to sell. The 102 is no different, they sell their NEA-15 for $1000 and I doubt the 102 costs them more than $40 more to build than it costs to build the -15. With all the overgassing and being finicky with ammo they obviously didn't do much R&D so why is the 102 $750 more? Because we're desperate and they know it. Throw out a pre-sale and it's sold out for the next two production runs and no one has even held one at that point. Had people said "no NEA is worth more than $1200" and said no to the pre-order price we would be buying them for $1200-$1500.
Pre-order is a scam, you think you're buying in to be the first one to have the latest and greatest but the reality is that you're just screwing yourself and paying more for the product which only benefits the manufacturer/importer/retailer.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom