Well, I took it to the range today, and overall was happy. I brought a couple boxes of Winchester 115 grain PP 9mm luger ammo, along with a box of IVI (1965 dated) to try in it. The majority of my ammo is older IVI, which normally feeds either my Sterling or my Inglis Hi-power. Both those guns seem to prefer the higher power Cdn ammo. However, because of my concerns for the sub-standard springs in this gun, I decided to test fire it with the Winchester to start with.
The first 5 mags went through flawlessly, then I had my first failure to eject. I put that particular mag aside, and tried a magazine of IVI 9mm. Went good for part of the mag until I had a failure to fire...weak strike on the primer. I went back to the Winchester for a couple more mags, but the FTFs were getting real bad. I opened up the gun and sure enough, the spring which would push the hammer onto the firing pin had started to deform from overcompression. I stretched it back out, and managed to get a few more mags off before it got bad again. So with under 100 rounds downrange, I had to call it a day.
I expected this, so now I have a few jobs to do....try and make a little more room for this spring, and replace it with a more reliable spring.
Sighting was way off as well. I had to drift the front sight way off to the right as I was missing a 2' square target at just over 25 yards. I got it to where I could consistantly hit the huns head, but that was at the same time as I ended up calling it a day. I will cut off and reweld the rear sight to a position where it will allow me to recenter the front sight. I also have to shave a couple thou off the front of the magwell housing as it's a bit tight against the front sight, and interferes with the installation of the finger guard.
Dear Wendy Cukier: this target is not what you think it is....I believe it is a drawing of an electrical insulater with some wierd shadows on it. Or maybe it's Bin Laden with his beard cut-off....I can't be sure.
Now for anyone who is going to comment on my grouping (or lack of it), the sten was never a tack driver....it was meant for close quarter fighting. As long as you were hitting a man size target at around 50 yards, you were doing fine. I had started to rotate the barrel to different positions, which will correct some of the sighting in problems, but again, had to call it a day.
It is a comparable gun to my sterling. Little recoil, and that feeling of nostalgia when firing it. Considering I have less than $600 into it, I am not too disapointed.
I should hear back from the CFC this week about a final FRT determination. Even if it comes back as non-acceptable, at least I got to fire it once. Someone mentioned in the thread earlier that once I had my certificate, perhaps the best thing to do was not to ask any questions. My hope is that more of you can have the fun and satisfaction of firing a sten. They are truly a piece of Canadian history. Despite the goofy bolt system on this one, and the home made magwell, and the 5 round mag capacity, it is still a cool gun.
