A shotgun is a shotgun, I have both a classic wingmaster and a "tactical" desert recon. They look different, but looks aside they tick the same way, it would be a pain to scour two forms for information that could likely apply to both guns.
This is a bit contradictory. You say you are tired of being insulted, you say you aren't trying to insult anyone and yet refer to those who don't agree with you as "Fudds that are full of themselves" and "bitter judgemental pricks."Yep .. I wonder why that is?? ... maybe some guys are tired of being insulted and ridiculed left right and center by Fudds that are full of themselves.
Not trying to insult anyone ... just look at the demographics of the two sides. Pretty easy to see which one is more likely to have bitter judgmental pricks as part of it's following.

That could be but non-tactical shotgunners will have three forums -- Shotgun non-tactical; Skeet/Trap/Sporting Clay; and Hunting.I changed my mind....The shotgun forums should be split.
There will be about 100 posts per day on the tacticool forum, while the other one will get 4 posts per day.
2 of the 4 posts will be "wow, who come this forum is so dead?"
![]()
the tactical shotgunners will have their vewy own forum and fewer feelings will be hurt.
Finger slip. Thanks for pointing it out.Freudian slip?
![]()
Freudian slip?
![]()
It's the least I could do. Giving him a chuckle is only fair after the many hours of amusement he's provided to some of us.Handsdown classic burn................
The "infighting" that you speak of is also not foreign to other forums - example: Hunting & Sporting Arms/Milsurp/Hunting etc ..... detracts nothing from there, so to speak.
I admire your sense on the importance of cohesiveness, however, it is not always possible to prevent collision courses in terms of difference in opinions be it within a single or numerous sub forums.
Via partition, what we could possibly accomplish is to narrow down the categories, and in the process, simultaneously assist to reduce the "catalysts" in many such conflicts.
Why don't some of the Nancies in this thread stop worrying about what other people say about their particular gun interests.
I personally feel that splitting is pointless, you will still have trolling, incendiary comments and attacks on what you like to do with your guns. Learn to deal with it and ignore any of the comments/suggestions you don't find helpful and/or positive. If someone is particularly inflammatory and does not heed warnings to stop, they can be removed.
Part of getting along is learning not to rise to the bait. Trolls troll because it's fun and there are no shortage of fools who step right up to give them exactly what they are looking for, a reaction.
It's the least I could do. Giving him a chuckle is only fair after the many hours of amusement he's provided to some of us.![]()
This is a bit contradictory. You say you are tired of being insulted, you say you aren't trying to insult anyone and yet refer to those who don't agree with you as "Fudds that are full of themselves" and "bitter judgemental pricks."
Clearly there is fault to be spread among more than one group for any stresses in the shotgun forum or in your world is calling someone a "bitter judgemental prick" not an insult?
Man, you are trying to pick a fight. Saying you aren't is calling us all stupid. You can imply all you want withought actually spitting out the words, but we all know what your trying to say so no use bull####ting.I'm not trying to pick a fight man. People just have top stop being so conceited, stop feeling "insulted" all the time and leave others be. (see, never said you were any of those things, but if you are insulted maybe it's because you see some truth in the previous statement)
Man, you are trying to pick a fight. Saying you aren't is calling us all stupid. You can imply all you want withought actually spitting out the words, but we all know what your trying to say so no use bulls**tting.
Pretty easy for you perhaps, but ive seen alot of fudd calling after someone suggests a 14" shotgun isnt necessarily the all-purpose shotgun one might think. This is a two way street.Not trying to insult anyone ... just look at the demographics of the two sides. Pretty easy to see which one is more likely to have bitter judgmental pricks as part of it's following.
There are very few more outspoken against "tacticool shotties" than Win/64 and claybuster, so who exactly are the bitter old prick fudds that you are referring to if not them? They are the same two who you seem to be arguing with. I think your insults are as pointed as they can be withought naming names. not that those guys need anyone sticking up for them.Who did I call a "bitter judgemental prick" ??? Nobody.
Those who are insulted by the post you quoted either want to be so they can pick a fight or need to learn how to read.
If i say Claybuster, you need to learn how to read. It is an insult ... plain and simple.
If I say Fudds are bitter old pricks and need to learn how to read. I'm stating that about Fudds, if you put yourself in the Fudd category and feel insulted that's your own doing, not mine.
God dammit man, some of you are ridiculous. I didn't put you in any category, you did.



























