Shotgun forum split???

Shotgun forum

  • One forum for all shotguns

    Votes: 133 27.7%
  • One for tactical/action, one for sporting/hunting

    Votes: 348 72.3%

  • Total voters
    481
Status
Not open for further replies.
A shotgun is a shotgun, I have both a classic wingmaster and a "tactical" desert recon. They look different, but looks aside they tick the same way, it would be a pain to scour two forms for information that could likely apply to both guns.
 
No offence folks - however, I find it unfortunate that Members have to regularly witness the constant series of "for/against" bickering that have slowly become a parasitic feature of the Shotgun Forum.

Personally speaking, I've had my fill of all this and moving forward neither intend nor look forward to revisiting this particular forum, split or otherwise....just not worth it anymore.

My best wishes to all of you here.
 
Yep .. I wonder why that is?? ... maybe some guys are tired of being insulted and ridiculed left right and center by Fudds that are full of themselves.

Not trying to insult anyone ... just look at the demographics of the two sides. Pretty easy to see which one is more likely to have bitter judgmental pricks as part of it's following.
This is a bit contradictory. You say you are tired of being insulted, you say you aren't trying to insult anyone and yet refer to those who don't agree with you as "Fudds that are full of themselves" and "bitter judgemental pricks."

Clearly there is fault to be spread among more than one group for any stresses in the shotgun forum or in your world is calling someone a "bitter judgemental prick" not an insult?
 
I changed my mind....The shotgun forums should be split.

There will be about 100 posts per day on the tacticool forum, while the other one will get 4 posts per day.

2 of the 4 posts will be "wow, who come this forum is so dead?"


:p:evil:
 
I changed my mind....The shotgun forums should be split.

There will be about 100 posts per day on the tacticool forum, while the other one will get 4 posts per day.

2 of the 4 posts will be "wow, who come this forum is so dead?"

:p:evil:
That could be but non-tactical shotgunners will have three forums -- Shotgun non-tactical; Skeet/Trap/Sporting Clay; and Hunting.

But the tactical shotgunners will have their very own forum and fewer feelings will be hurt.
 
Last edited:
the tactical shotgunners will have their vewy own forum and fewer feelings will be hurt.

Freudian slip? :D

Elmer_Fudd_A_Wild_Hare.jpg
 
The "infighting" that you speak of is also not foreign to other forums - example: Hunting & Sporting Arms/Milsurp/Hunting etc ..... detracts nothing from there, so to speak.

I admire your sense on the importance of cohesiveness, however, it is not always possible to prevent collision courses in terms of difference in opinions be it within a single or numerous sub forums.

Via partition, what we could possibly accomplish is to narrow down the categories, and in the process, simultaneously assist to reduce the "catalysts" in many such conflicts.

points taken...it's the nature of divisiveness that will ultimately lead to our collective downfall...
I own tactical,hunting and sport shooting shotguns so I will just have to browse more forums I guess...
 
Why don't some of the Nancies in this thread stop worrying about what other people say about their particular gun interests.

I personally feel that splitting is pointless, you will still have trolling, incendiary comments and attacks on what you like to do with your guns. Learn to deal with it and ignore any of the comments/suggestions you don't find helpful and/or positive. If someone is particularly inflammatory and does not heed warnings to stop, they can be removed.

Part of getting along is learning not to rise to the bait. Trolls troll because it's fun and there are no shortage of fools who step right up to give them exactly what they are looking for, a reaction.

+1 I pretty much 100% agree with this guy.
 
It's the least I could do. Giving him a chuckle is only fair after the many hours of amusement he's provided to some of us. :)

This is why we need to keep you lovers together.

I like the differing opinions, it makes the shotgun forum exciting and interesting. As much as I love all guns, the shotgun forum always has something interesting to read. I can't say that about the other forums all the time. Try reading in the red rifle forum for a while. So dry, all the threads are exactly the same. Sks this, sks that, who loves there sks the most, bla bla bla. As much as I love my sks, I learned all I need to know about it as soon as I shot it and took it apart for the first time. And for $200 its a lesson everyone can learn. BORING!

Let's keep this forum diverse just like the characteristics of the shotgun, the gun that can do-it-all. Let's just try not bickering as much and also be a lil thicker skinned.
 
This is a bit contradictory. You say you are tired of being insulted, you say you aren't trying to insult anyone and yet refer to those who don't agree with you as "Fudds that are full of themselves" and "bitter judgemental pricks."

Clearly there is fault to be spread among more than one group for any stresses in the shotgun forum or in your world is calling someone a "bitter judgemental prick" not an insult?

I never referred to anyone that doesn't agree with me. I never insulted anyone who disagrees with me directly or on purpose/with intent. I'm not tired of being insulted as I generally stay pretty neutral because I don't see the point in arguing, thus I don't get s**t on too often. I like CGN (most of the time lol) and any effects that are detrimental to the community's overall health I want no part in.

The blame is to be spread, I agree with you on that one.

Who did I call a "bitter judgemental prick" ??? Nobody.

I simply stated a stereotypical category of individuals/trolls that are IMO too "opinionated" and attempt to drag some that frequent the Shotgun Forum down to their level in order to beat whoever the nemesis of the day is with experience. If someone feels "insulted" by my post it is their own doing. They put themselves in the stated category on their own, not me.

Those who are insulted by the post you quoted either want to be so they can pick a fight or need to learn how to read.

If i say Claybuster, you need to learn how to read. It is an insult ... plain and simple.

If I say Fudds are bitter old pricks and need to learn how to read. I'm stating that about Fudds, if you put yourself in the Fudd category and feel insulted that's your own doing, not mine.

I'm not trying to pick a fight man. People just have top stop being so conceited, stop feeling "insulted" all the time and leave others be. (see, never said you were any of those things, but if you are insulted maybe it's because you see some truth in the previous statement)

Writing with disclaimers that state "this is not an insult" every two sentences is kind of a PITA. It's all about perception.
 
I'm not trying to pick a fight man. People just have top stop being so conceited, stop feeling "insulted" all the time and leave others be. (see, never said you were any of those things, but if you are insulted maybe it's because you see some truth in the previous statement)
Man, you are trying to pick a fight. Saying you aren't is calling us all stupid. You can imply all you want withought actually spitting out the words, but we all know what your trying to say so no use bull####ting.
 
A shotgun is a shotgun is a shotgun there's a statement please let the tactical guys have there own form the art of shotguning has nothing to do with selfdefence weapons . If I did want a shotgun for self defence it would be the best pump ever made it allready holds 7 rounds it has a tapered fireing so if it breaks it will still fire and not come flying out the end of thebreech bolt and will fire faster than any other pump gun and it doesn't have to be black. That's wright a Model 12 Winnie
 
Man, you are trying to pick a fight. Saying you aren't is calling us all stupid. You can imply all you want withought actually spitting out the words, but we all know what your trying to say so no use bulls**tting.

God dammit man, some of you are ridiculous. I didn't put you in any category, you did. I'm not implying anything in regards to you ... if you feel insulted you are the one finding similarities between the stereotype I posted and yourself. I don't even know you or what side your on, how can I insult you intentionally without resorting to 2nd grade insults?

Go through my previous posts for other threads bud .. how often have I picked a fight for no reason? Go see how often I belittle someones opinion "just because".

We will never come to a consensus on who WE are as a community. Which is why in the long run we will likely hang separately. This is the reason why I do not pick fights, if some gun owners belittle and can't accept other gun owners for who they are how in hell are the antis/misinformed ever going to accept us.
 
Not trying to insult anyone ... just look at the demographics of the two sides. Pretty easy to see which one is more likely to have bitter judgmental pricks as part of it's following.
Pretty easy for you perhaps, but ive seen alot of fudd calling after someone suggests a 14" shotgun isnt necessarily the all-purpose shotgun one might think. This is a two way street.
Who did I call a "bitter judgemental prick" ??? Nobody.
Those who are insulted by the post you quoted either want to be so they can pick a fight or need to learn how to read.
If i say Claybuster, you need to learn how to read. It is an insult ... plain and simple.
If I say Fudds are bitter old pricks and need to learn how to read. I'm stating that about Fudds, if you put yourself in the Fudd category and feel insulted that's your own doing, not mine.
There are very few more outspoken against "tacticool shotties" than Win/64 and claybuster, so who exactly are the bitter old prick fudds that you are referring to if not them? They are the same two who you seem to be arguing with. I think your insults are as pointed as they can be withought naming names. not that those guys need anyone sticking up for them.
God dammit man, some of you are ridiculous. I didn't put you in any category, you did.

This is what im talking about. You quote me and then say some of you guys are rediculous. That was definitely directed at me. lol not that I care. I wasnt sticking up for either side, merely pointing out some of the inconsistencies in your argument. I dont really care who you insult, but when you try to say you arent insulting anyone at all, i gotta call BS cause you clearly are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom