At least somebody noticed?!! Especially easy to tell in the plucked and ready to cook pics. No wild duck is shaped or coloured like that!!
LOL, yeah, the white wing band and speckled feet are a dead give away!
At least somebody noticed?!! Especially easy to tell in the plucked and ready to cook pics. No wild duck is shaped or coloured like that!!
Then I hardly call that hunting.
Ah! But in Gatehouse's defence he never said he "hunted" ducks, only that he "shot" ducks and with a 22 short to the head. In looking at his pics it was easy to see he is doing his domestic duck round up and slaughter and is using a 22 pump to dispatch them rather than chop their heads off like a chicken.
How do you construe backing someone up as playing games? In all honesty the inability to comprehend the English language by those who responded to Gatehouse's original post seems the issue to me. When I read it I read it exactly as it was written. I did notread once that he hunted ducks or even shot them on water for that matter as he never stated either but right away the "you can't do that" crowd on here jumped on it right away with their assumptions rather than asking for a clarification. Did you notice after a few immediate following posts of the discussion on shooting at migratory birds with a 22 I myself asked if anyone could verify that I thought I could recall it being printed on the Federal regs about it being illegal to use a rifle for migratory birds? One should always know before posting for the very reason you mention. So that someone does not take it as gospel and run with it and someone did in fact post a copy of the regs from a website. That was perfect, a job well done. Again I will say Gatehouse never at any point said he was hunting or had hunted ducks with a 22 and if you read through his posts you can see he purposefully never said he had. Again it is simple comprehension of the written word, not jumping to conclusions through assumptions. I am done, carry on.......
Shooting ducks on the water AKA, stttin ducks is bad juju![]()
defense?? .this is not the place if one wants to play games and this was a hunting forum he posted in is it not??. Most of us take our hunting and shooting way too serious for this bs
not to mention this site is full of sponges who soak up everything and next thing we will hear about another guy killed because someone was using a 22 to hunt ducks cause he read it on nutz and it was legal to do so.
Guess the mods are ok with that but i am sure not. Since until clarified it is clearly a violation for rule 1
any discussion and/or promotion of illegal activities.
but you guys don't see that or let me guess that will never happen again well suprise stray bullets from idiots shooting into spreads have killed more than one waterfowl hunter in a blind over the years we don't need any more of these events
easy to see ??? Well on the comments about just look at the plucked pics well boys that all depends i guess on where you hunt and what your ducks have been eating. Yes i have hunted ducks many times out west and in many of our provinces so can quack
there are many spots here locally where we get into ducks from time to time that come into the decoys that have been hand feed all year by people and guess what they look identical when plucked. Bread ducks we call them , over sized and they taste terrible. On my street right now i can drive 600 feet and there will be over 100 wild ducks in a yard being hand fed every day of the year
also our domestic ducks are double the size of these in the pics so why would it be easy to see for all. Tell me please
so one size doesn't fit all here like some may think and some may not see these as domestic or barn yard taken
but you guys know all that. Sure clear to me not
cheers
Not everyone... "single shot muck jumpers" don't ever get to feel superior...
Eventually you have to bottom out, there's only so low you can sink, even in mud. However even the lowest of the low still have a trump card to play; everyone else is an elitist. Those with re-peet-tors are shameless game hogs, and those with doubles have more money than brains. Those with waders that don't leak and most of their teeth are soft city pretty boys, and those with large decoy spreads and great equipment are probably over limit poachers. Reverse elitism is pretty handy; if you can't rise from the mud throw it around or see if you can drag someone else down with you.
Eventually you have to bottom out, there's only so low you can sink, even in mud. However even the lowest of the low still have a trump card to play; everyone else is an elitist. Those with re-peet-tors are shameless game hogs, and those with doubles have more money than brains. Those with waders that don't leak and most of their teeth are soft city pretty boys, and those with large decoy spreads and great equipment are probably over limit poachers. Reverse elitism is pretty handy; if you can't rise from the mud throw it around or see if you can drag someone else down with you.
I would like to raise my hand at this time to point out that my hunting partners and I hunt over a spread of 600+ mixed Snow, Canada, Specklebelly and field Mallard decoys and have plans to increase that number to 1,000! Proud to be an over-limit poacher even if a tired one from setting and picking up that spread each hunt!!![]()
Eventually you have to bottom out, there's only so low you can sink, even in mud. However even the lowest of the low still have a trump card to play; everyone else is an elitist. Those with re-peet-tors are shameless game hogs, and those with doubles have more money than brains. Those with waders that don't leak and most of their teeth are soft city pretty boys, and those with large decoy spreads and great equipment are probably over limit poachers. Reverse elitism is pretty handy; if you can't rise from the mud throw it around or see if you can drag someone else down with you.
I would like to raise my hand at this time to point out that my hunting partners and I hunt over a spread of 600+ mixed Snow, Canada, Specklebelly and field Mallard decoys and have plans to increase that number to 1,000! Proud to be an over-limit poacher even if a tired one from setting and picking up that spread each hunt!!![]()
Man Medved got ripped into in this thread.
European game management and hunting are a lot different than North American hunting. If you think hunting in Western Europe is bad I'm sure you would enjoy yourself netting songbirds in North Africa...
Even in our country, the Alberta hunters ed tells you not to shoot a running deer like four times, meanwhile hunters in Ontario post up and chase deer through the forest to their fellows.
I am not experienced at duck hunting but I look forward to meeting these ducks that land and sit in range waiting for me to shoot them.
Just courious. How many does this old trap shooter ( if I remember correctly you were/are) not take on the wing. My guess would be almost none if any
Cheers
I can see how that would be a royal pain in the a$$...but its these kinds of things that we do for the love of the hunt! I dream of these kinds of hunts for Snows...and Im green with envy for those who have it available at their doorstep.
None.....it's been years and years since I have sluiced a duck on water or land.![]()
Thought soI would have been shocked if you did . Just not something I have found trap or skeet shooters ever do
My apologies for you taking my post as you did. That was not my intent and should have been more clear where the frustration was directed
Have a Merry Christmas and keep smoking them all![]()